Coinbase has stepped into the Prime Belief chapter case, submitting an amicus transient to push again in opposition to a movement that would threaten buyer asset protections.
In a Feb. 5 courtroom submitting, the trade has urged the courtroom to uphold Uniform Industrial Code (UCC) Article 8, a authorized framework that ensures custodial property stay prospects’ property.
In line with the trade:
“Article 8 comprises unambiguous statutory textual content that events might comply with deal with a bunch of property, together with money or digital property, as monetary property credited to a securities account, and that property topic to such settlement are usually not property of the custodian’s property.”
Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Authorized Officer (CLO), additional emphasised in an X put up that UCC Article 8 establishes a elementary precept—buyer property saved by custodians don’t belong to the custodian. As a substitute, they continue to be the property of the rightful house owners.
In line with Grewal, Coinbase and Prime Belief have consumer agreements that clearly state that prospects retain full possession of their property. He argued that any try to classify these holdings as a part of a custodian’s property throughout chapter would contradict these agreements and undermine authorized protections.
Grewal pressured that UCC Article 8 isn’t just about crypto—it’s a foundational authorized safeguard designed to maintain buyer property separate from a custodian’s holdings. He warned that permitting property to be absorbed into Prime Belief’s chapter proceedings may erode market belief and disrupt monetary stability.
The problem arose after Prime Belief filed for Chapter 11 chapter in August 2023 following extreme monetary troubles. As a part of its chapter proceedings, the property’s managers filed a Dedication Movement on Jan. 15, proposing to merge buyer funds with the platform’s property.
Coinbase believes that granting this movement may set a harmful precedent that weakens prospects’ authorized protections in crypto and conventional finance.
Contemplating this, the agency urged the courtroom to reject the Dedication Movement to make sure that established authorized protections stay intact.
Grewal concluded that courts have persistently strengthened these ideas and will do the identical on this case. He wrote:
“Defending buyer property is paramount to belief and safety.”