Key Takeaways
- Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming not too long ago rejected Bitcoin reserve payments.
- Lawmakers cited issues over taxpayer danger and speculative investments.
- Arizona and Utah proceed to advance proposals permitting state funding in Bitcoin.
In latest weeks, three U.S. states—Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming—have voted down payments aimed toward creating state Bitcoin reserves, regardless of heightened federal enthusiasm underneath President Trump.
Considerations over hypothesis and taxpayer danger have pushed these rejections.
Montana’s resolution
In Montana, Home Invoice 429, which proposed investing public funds into digital belongings, valuable metals, and stablecoins, was defeated 41-59.
Consultant Steven Kelly opposed the measure, describing it as overly speculative and dangerous for taxpayer funds.
Kelly said throughout the Home debate:
This simply smacks of hypothesis
Different state votes
North Dakota equally voted down HB 1184, a invoice that may have channeled state cash into Bitcoin, dropping in a decisive 57-32 vote.
Wyoming, a traditionally Bitcoin-friendly state and residential to Senator Cynthia Lummis, additionally rejected HB 0201, with seven of 9 lawmakers voting in opposition to investing public treasury funds into Bitcoin.
Ongoing efforts
Regardless of these setbacks, some states proceed pursuing comparable measures.
Arizona’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act, proposing as much as 10% of state funds be allotted to Bitcoin, not too long ago superior by way of the Senate Finance Committee.
In Utah, laws that may permit investing as much as 5% of public funds in digital belongings can also be nearing passage.
Further proposals
Roughly 19 further states, together with Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Oklahoma, and Texas, have lively proposals to combine Bitcoin into public reserves.