Dunamu, the mother or father firm of South Korea’s largest crypto alternate, Upbit, has reportedly taken authorized motion towards the nation’s Monetary Intelligence Unit (FIU) over a enterprise suspension order.
This comes as South Korean authorities are tightening their grip on crypto-related crimes by launching a devoted unit to deal with digital asset investigations.
Upbit challenges FIU
On Feb. 28, Dunamu reportedly filed a lawsuit with the Seoul Administrative Court docket in search of to overturn the FIU’s sanctions.
Final November, South Korean regulators accused Upbit of failing to conduct correct buyer due diligence in a whole bunch of 1000’s of instances.
As a consequence of this, the FIU barred the alternate’s new clients from transferring digital belongings on Upbit between March 7 and June 6
Nonetheless, Dunamu has challenged this place, arguing that the penalty will considerably influence its operations.
Dunamu insisted that it has taken obligatory compliance measures in response to regulatory considerations and believes the sanctions are disproportionate. The agency additionally claimed that the FIU sanctions have been made with out totally contemplating key information and circumstances.
Devoted crypto unit
In a parallel growth, South Korea’s Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Workplace has launched a specialised Joint Investigation Unit (JIU) to fight cryptocurrency-related crimes, as native media reported on Feb. 27.
In keeping with the report, the newly established unit contains 35 monetary regulators and prosecutors from the Monetary Companies Fee and the Monetary Supervisory Service. Their major focus is investigating and prosecuting crypto-related fraud, theft, and illicit market actions.
The authorities launched this initiative following the success of a short lived process pressure arrange in 2023 to fight rising cryptocurrency-related offenses. The rising complexity of those crimes prompted the creation of a everlasting unit to make sure more practical enforcement.
Because the launch of the preliminary process pressure, prosecutors have charged 74 people and arrested 25 in instances involving fraudulent schemes and market manipulation.