Key Takeaways
- VanEck’s Matthew Sigel warns that public firms shopping for bitcoin threat shareholder dilution if their market cap approaches their bitcoin holdings.
- Semler Scientific’s share value has fallen over 45% in 2024, bringing its market cap near parity with its 3,808 BTC treasury.
- Sigel urges corporations to pause share choices and prioritize buybacks if inventory trades beneath NAV, and to tie govt compensation to NAV progress, not bitcoin accumulation.
VanEck flags threat for bitcoin-buying firms
Matthew Sigel, head of digital belongings analysis at VanEck, has warned that public firms accumulating bitcoin might face important dangers if their inventory value falls close to or beneath the online asset worth (NAV) of their bitcoin holdings.
In a current assertion, Sigel famous:
“If the inventory trades at or close to NAV, continued fairness issuance can dilute fairly than create worth.”
SMLR
Whereas no public firm has traded beneath its bitcoin NAV for a sustained interval, Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) is now approaching parity.
Semler, a medical expertise agency that started buying bitcoin in Might 2024, holds 3,808 BTC—presently value $404.6 million.
Regardless of bitcoin’s sturdy efficiency this yr, Semler’s share value has dropped by over 45%, bringing its market cap to roughly $434.7 million, practically equal to its bitcoin worth.
Safeguards urged as dilution threat grows
Semler and comparable corporations have raised capital by way of a number of fairness and debt choices to purchase extra bitcoin.
Sigel recommends these firms implement safeguards, corresponding to pausing at-the-market share choices if their inventory trades beneath 0.95x NAV for a minimum of 10 days.
He additionally suggested prioritizing share buybacks when bitcoin appreciates however the inventory value fails to mirror these good points, and prompt a strategic assessment—doubtlessly together with a merger or ending the bitcoin technique—if a NAV low cost persists.
Govt pay ought to concentrate on NAV progress
Lastly, Sigel argued that govt compensation needs to be tied to progress in NAV per share, not merely the scale of the bitcoin stack or share rely.
He concluded:
“As soon as you’re buying and selling at NAV, shareholder dilution is not strategic. It’s extractive.”