Given the Trump administration’s vocal and demonstrated help for crypto, some traders are questioning whether or not gold’s days because the world’s favourite hedge asset are numbered.
André Dragosch, European head of analysis at Bitwise Asset Administration, suggests the selection isn’t so easy. In a submit on X Saturday, he supplied a rule-of-thumb: gold nonetheless works finest as safety in opposition to inventory market losses, whereas bitcoin more and more acts as a counterweight to bond market stress.
Gold: Fairness Hedge of Selection
The reasoning begins with historical past. When equities unload, traders usually rush into gold. A long time of market information again this up. Gold’s long-run correlation with the S&P 500 has hovered close to zero, and through market stress it usually dips adverse.
For instance, within the 2022 bear market, gold costs rose about 5% even because the S&P 500 tumbled almost 20%. That sample illustrates why gold remains to be thought-about the traditional “protected haven.”
Bitcoin: A Bond-Market Counterweight
Bitcoin, against this, has usually struggled throughout fairness panics. In 2022, it collapsed greater than 60% alongside tech shares. However its relationship with U.S. Treasuries has been extra intriguing.
A number of research observe that bitcoin has proven a low and even barely adverse correlation with authorities bonds. Which means when bond costs sink and yields rise — as they did in 2023 throughout fears over U.S. debt and deficits — bitcoin has generally held up higher than gold.
Dragosch’s takeaway: traders don’t want to select one over the opposite. They play completely different roles. Gold remains to be the higher hedge when shares wobble, whereas bitcoin could assist portfolios when bond markets are below stress from rising charges or fiscal worries.
How the Rule Holds in 2025
The cut up has been clear this yr. As of Aug. 31, gold was up greater than 30% year-to-date, in line with World Gold Council information. That surge displays renewed demand throughout bouts of fairness volatility tied to tariffs, slowing progress, and political threat.
Bitcoin, in the meantime, has gained about 16.46% this yr, primarily based on CoinDesk Information, a strong efficiency contemplating that 10-year U.S. Treasury yields have fallen round 7.33%, in line with MarketWatch information.
The S&P 500, by comparability, is up roughly 10% in 2025, per CNBC information.
The diverging efficiency underscores Dragosch’s heuristic: gold has benefited most from fairness jitters, whereas bitcoin has held its floor as bond markets wobble below the burden of upper yields and heavy authorities borrowing.
Not Simply Opinion: Information Backs It
This isn’t simply Dragosch’s private view. A Bitwise analysis report earlier this yr famous that gold stays a dependable hedge in opposition to inventory market downturns, whereas bitcoin has tended to offer stronger returns throughout recoveries and exhibits decrease correlation with U.S. Treasuries. The report concluded that holding each property can enhance diversification and optimize risk-adjusted returns.
The Caveats
Nonetheless, correlations aren’t static. Bitcoin’s ties to equities have strengthened in 2025 due to massive inflows into spot ETFs, which have introduced in billions from institutional traders.
The large internet inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs makes BTC commerce extra like a mainstream threat asset, lowering its “purity” as a bond hedge.
Quick-term shocks may scramble the image. Regulatory surprises, liquidity squeezes, or macro shocks could transfer each gold and bitcoin in the identical path, limiting their usefulness as hedges. Dragosch’s rule-of-thumb, in different phrases, is simply that — a heuristic, not a assure.
The Backside Line
Trump’s pro-crypto stance raises a provocative query: is it time to desert gold totally in favor of bitcoin? Dragosch’s reply, supported by years of information, isn’t any. Gold nonetheless works finest when shares tumble, whereas bitcoin could provide shelter when bonds are below stress. For traders, the lesson isn’t ditching one asset for the opposite, however recognizing that they hedge completely different dangers — and utilizing each will be the smarter play.