Close Menu
Cryprovideos
    What's Hot

    Bitcoin Stalls on Charge Minimize as Hopes Fade—Will This Week Be Completely different? – BeInCrypto

    September 21, 2025

    Cardano (ADA) Value Prediction for September 21 – U.At this time

    September 21, 2025

    Web Laptop (ICP) Worth Holds Above Key Help as Technical Indicators Present Blended Alerts

    September 21, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Cryprovideos
    • Home
    • Crypto News
    • Bitcoin
    • Altcoins
    • Markets
    Cryprovideos
    Home»Bitcoin»Jimmy Music slams Bitcoin Core devs for 'fiat' mentality on OP_Return
    Jimmy Music slams Bitcoin Core devs for 'fiat' mentality on OP_Return
    Bitcoin

    Jimmy Music slams Bitcoin Core devs for 'fiat' mentality on OP_Return

    By Crypto EditorSeptember 21, 2025Updated:September 21, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Jimmy Music, a Bitcoin (BTC) developer and advocate, slammed the choice by Bitcoin Core builders to take away the OP_Return restrict for non-monetary knowledge embedded on the Bitcoin blockchain within the upcoming Bitcoin Core 30 improve, calling it “fiat” mentality.

    Music accused the Core builders of deflecting person issues about eradicating the OP_Return restrict, which is presently 80 bytes in dimension, and ignoring the numerous pushback from the Bitcoin neighborhood and node runners. He additionally mentioned:

    “The concept that spam is troublesome to outline, and due to this ambiguity, we should not be making any distinctions in any respect within the software program, is a time-wasting argument from fiat politics the place you faux to not know the plain, so the precise debate can by no means get off the bottom — the non-monetary makes use of of Bitcoin are spam.

    You may argue whether or not that is one thing fascinating or not, however saying you may’t outline it’s a stalling tactic meant to keep away from the true argument about precise impression — significantly, the long-term impression of this modification,” Music continued.

    Jimmy Music slams Bitcoin Core devs for 'fiat' mentality on OP_Return
    The pull request for eradicating the OP_Return restrict was extremely unpopular with the Bitcoin neighborhood, however was pushed via regardless. Supply: GitHub

    The OP_Return debate has raged on for almost six months, and is harking back to the Bitcoin block dimension wars that came about between 2015 and 2017, which finally resulted in a tough fork of the Bitcoin protocol that spawned Bitcoin Money (BCH), main some within the Bitcoin neighborhood to take a position if the OP_Return wars will end in an analogous break up.

    Associated: Taproot creators didn’t foresee its ‘trolling worth’ — Bitcoin dev

    Node runners vote with their ft in historic exodus to Bitcoin Knots

    The choice by Bitcoin Core devs to unilaterally blow open the OP_Return knowledge restrict has left the Bitcoin neighborhood divided and pushed report numbers of Bitcoin node runners to Bitcoin Knots, an alternate implementation of the Bitcoin node software program.

    This surge in nodes working Bitcoin Knots, which now account for about 20% of the community, in comparison with about 1% in 2024, represents a near-vertical leap in simply 9 months.

    Bitcoin Core, Decentralization, Bitcoin Block Size, Nodes, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Ordinals
    A breakdown of the completely different node software program implementations on the Bitcoin community. Supply: Coin Dance

    Knots permits node runners to implement strict knowledge dimension limits, which proponents argue is critical to protect the decentralization of the Bitcoin protocol.

    The Bitcoin ledger has generated about 680 gigabytes of knowledge because the inception of the decentralized protocol in 2009, because of the straightforward structure of Bitcoin and strict knowledge limits.

    Bitcoin’s low knowledge storage necessities permit anybody to run a node on retail pc {hardware} for as little as $300, democratizing entry and guaranteeing most decentralization.

    For comparability, higher-throughput blockchain networks and sensible contract platforms, which generate way more knowledge, can value tens of 1000’s of {dollars} to run and require specialised industrial {hardware}, that means solely rich buyers and enormous companies can run nodes and implement the consensus guidelines of these protocols.

    Strong {hardware} necessities translate into elevated centralization of a blockchain protocol and a heightened threat that a couple of nodes can collude to change the consensus guidelines or reverse transactions.

    Journal: Bitcoin’s long-term safety funds downside: Impending disaster or FUD?