US crypto change FTX has filed a lawsuit in opposition to Dunamu, the operator of South Korea’s largest change Upbit, to recuperate greater than $53 million in belongings.
The lawsuit, part of the continuing FTX chapter proceedings, was filed by FTX’s subsidiary Alameda Analysis on November 5, 2024, with the US Chapter Courtroom for the District of Delaware. The case continues to be pending.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Why Is FTX Suing Dunamu?
The lawsuit filed by FTX in opposition to Dunamu is a “grievance for the return of belongings and violation of automated keep.” The core of the declare is that Dunamu, via its Upbit change, is holding FTX’s belongings and will return them.
In keeping with Alameda Analysis, the corporate opened digital asset storage accounts on crypto exchanges worldwide. It opened these accounts not solely in its personal identify but in addition below worker names or shell firms. The aim was to create a kind of secret nominee account.
Unraveling a “Secret Account”
Alameda claims that somebody opened one in all these secret accounts on Upbit below Yang Jai Sung’s identify, and an e-mail tackle, [email protected].
FTX alleges the account was a secret Alameda account. That is primarily based on an inner messenger dialog from March 2022, the place an Alameda worker mentioned, “Upbit authentication is full.” The agency additionally famous that the seoyuncharles88 e-mail tackle routinely forwarded to an Alameda tackle.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Moreover, FTX claims that Yang Jai Sung is the daddy of Charles Yang, the top dealer for Genesis Block. That is an Alameda affiliate, and the declare is predicated on a lawsuit between FTX and Genesis Block.
FTX entered chapter proceedings in November 2022 after revelations of buyer fund misuse and accounting irregularities. Misusing buyer funds via its affiliate, Alameda, was a big level of rivalry. In consequence, founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was sentenced to 25 years in jail in March 2024.
FTX claims it requested the return of the belongings from Dunamu a number of occasions, however Dunamu has not complied with no legitimate motive. FTX made the primary request on November 16, 2022, and a second one in January 2023, however acquired no response.
The Case Heats Up
In keeping with the grievance, Dunamu responded in July 2023, saying it couldn’t even affirm the Alameda Analysis account existed. It demanded proof that Alameda Analysis truly managed the account.
Though Alameda Analysis supplied documentation, Dunamu notified them that the “submitted supplies had been inadequate.” The corporate wouldn’t proceed with no doc proving a contract between Alameda and Yang Jai Sung.
FTX defined that SBF’s felony trial testimony included an announcement that an “$8 billion debt was hidden via the seoyuncharles88 account.”
FTX additionally connected an affidavit from former Alameda Analysis CEO Caroline Ellison. Within the affidavit, she said that “one of many Alameda accounts was an Upbit account registered utilizing the seoyuncharles88 e-mail, and Alameda managed, used, and funded this account.”
A Dunamu consultant informed BeInCrypto that “the questioned account is at present frozen on account of anti-money laundering points,” including, “Dunamu is within the position of safekeeping the frozen digital belongings.”