In short
- Blockchain.com obtained its MiCA license in Malta, becoming a member of corporations together with Gate and Gemini.
- EU regulators have warned Malta over inconsistent supervision beneath the brand new crypto regime.
- The transfer comes because the island nation tightens restrictions on new crypto mining and licensing practices.
Blockchain.com has secured a MiCA license in Malta, the most recent in a wave of crypto corporations in search of entry to the EU market by way of the island, together with Kraken, Gate, and Gemini.
A spokesperson for Blockchain.com advised Decrypt that Malta provided “the correct mixture of regulatory transparency, institutional experience, and strategic entry to the European Financial Space”.
“It would function the middle of our European operations transferring ahead. With Fiorentina D’Amore now main our EU technique from Malta, we’re properly positioned to increase companies throughout the area with full compliance and robust native management,” they added.
The licensing marks a big growth for Blockchain.com in Europe, the place the corporate has reoriented its enterprise away from centralized exchanges towards brokerage, institutional infrastructure, and self-custody pockets companies—all segments it sees as more and more essential.
A spokesperson stated the agency can be monitoring regulatory developments within the UK, Singapore, Latin America, and the Center East, and stays attentive to the opportunity of a U.S. public itemizing—although it didn’t handle rumors from earlier this week that it was planning for one.
MiCA and “passporting”
MiCA, quick for Markets in Crypto-Property Regulation, got here into full impact in late 2024, creating the primary unified rulebook for digital asset suppliers throughout the European Union. It permits crypto corporations to use for authorization in a single member state and use it as a “passport” to function all through the 27-country bloc.
Malta’s light-touch strategy to crypto regulation has raised eyebrows amongst European regulators. In mid-September, markets authorities from France, Austria, and Italy referred to as for stronger EU oversight, noting that early implementation of MiCA has revealed main variations in how nationwide regulators supervise crypto markets. They argued that direct supervision by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) would higher defend traders.
A July ESMA evaluation of Malta’s licensing practices discovered that whereas the Malta Monetary Providers Authority (MFSA) demonstrated strong experience and cooperation, some dangers weren’t absolutely assessed throughout authorization. Critics say Malta’s lenient stance on playing and its historical past of providing “golden passports” have fed perceptions of regulatory arbitrage permitting simpler entry to the EU than could be attainable in neighbouring nations.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has additionally flagged what it calls “discussion board purchasing,” the place crypto firms search authorization in nations perceived as extra lenient earlier than utilizing their licenses throughout the EU. It warned this observe may undermine the integrity of the bloc’s monetary system.
Regardless of the criticism, some authorized consultants argue regulatory range is an inevitable function of a single market. Dr. Hendrik Müller-Lankow, a lawyer at German agency Kronsteyn, beforehand advised Decrypt that supervisory arbitrage is happening throughout Europe however stays a byproduct of balancing nationwide discretion with EU integration.
“It’s well-known that individuals—and thus additionally authorities—in several member states have totally different mentalities when making use of legal guidelines,” he stated.
Day by day Debrief E-newsletter
Begin every single day with the highest information tales proper now, plus unique options, a podcast, movies and extra.

