In short
- Sam Altman acknowledged on November 6 that OpenAI “doesn’t have or need authorities ensures” for its information facilities.
- That declare got here in response to CFO Sarah Friar’s earlier remark suggesting a federal “backstop” might assist finance AI infrastructure—remarks she shortly retracted.
- A letter OpenAI despatched to the White Home on October 27 straight contradicts Altman’s denial, explicitly requesting mortgage ensures and different federal monetary help for AI infrastructure.
OpenAI explicitly requested federal mortgage ensures for AI infrastructure in an October 27 letter to the White Home—which kindly refused the supply, with AI czar David Sacks saying that at the least 5 different firms might take OpenAI’s place—straight contradicting CEO Sam Altman’s public statements claiming the corporate does not need authorities help.
The 11-page letter, submitted to the Workplace of Science and Know-how Coverage, referred to as for increasing tax credit and deploying “grants, cost-sharing agreements, loans, or mortgage ensures to increase industrial base capability” for AI information facilities and grid parts. The letter detailed how “direct funding might additionally assist shorten lead occasions for crucial grid parts—transformers, HVDC converters, switchgear, and cables—from years to months.”
“Preliminary investments might be made utilizing present authorities such because the Protection Manufacturing Act Title III and the Division of Power’s Mortgage Packages Workplace,” OpenAI mentioned.
Simply 10 days later, on November 6, Altman posted on X that “we do not need or need authorities ensures for OpenAI information facilities,” including that “taxpayers shouldn’t bail out firms that make dangerous enterprise choices.”
I want to make clear just a few issues.
First, the apparent one: we do not need or need authorities ensures for OpenAI datacenters. We consider that governments shouldn’t decide winners or losers, and that taxpayers shouldn’t bail out firms that make dangerous enterprise choices or…
— Sam Altman (@sama) November 6, 2025
The contradiction emerged after OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar informed a Wall Avenue Journal occasion on November 5 {that a} federal “backstop” might assist decrease financing prices and improve debt capability for AI infrastructure.
Her feedback triggered fierce backlash. For instance, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis tweeted that the federal government shouldn’t bail out tech firms. Sacks wrote that “there will likely be no federal bailout for AI.”
Friar shortly walked again her feedback on LinkedIn, saying OpenAI wasn’t looking for a authorities backstop for infrastructure commitments.
“I need to make clear my feedback earlier at this time. OpenAI isn’t looking for a authorities backstop for our infrastructure commitments. I used the phrase ‘backstop’ and it muddied the purpose,” she wrote. “As the complete clip of my reply reveals, I used to be making the purpose that American energy in expertise will come from constructing actual industrial capability, which requires the personal sector and authorities taking part in their half.”
Altman’s prolonged X publish the subsequent day amplified this message. “Our CFO talked about authorities financing yesterday, after which later clarified her level, underscoring that she might have phrased issues extra clearly. As talked about above, we predict that the U.S. authorities ought to have a nationwide technique for its personal AI infrastructure,” his tweet reads.
In fact, this transfer additionally generated backlash.
AI researcher Gary Marcus revealed the October 27 letter, calling Altman’s denial “mendacity his ass off” and noting the letter explicitly requested the very mortgage ensures Altman claimed to not need. The letter stays publicly accessible on OpenAI’s content material supply community.
This is not the primary time Altman’s statements have confronted scrutiny. OpenAI’s board briefly fired him in November 2023 for being “not constantly candid,” based on the board’s assertion. Former board member Helen Toner later detailed on a podcast how Altman had withheld data and made it troublesome for the board to meet its oversight duties. A latest deposition from former OpenAI Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever, who voted to take away Altman, additional documented considerations about his candor.
OpenAI didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark in regards to the October 27 letter or the obvious contradiction with Altman’s statements.
Typically Clever E-newsletter
A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI mannequin.

