The Democrats are turning their hearth on the Securities and Change Fee (SEC), a extremely highly effective US regulator, after the company ditched its long-running instances in opposition to Ripple and different firms.
They argue that this sudden retreat jeopardizes investor safety and the credibility of U.S. markets.
A sharply worded letter
In a scathing letter to SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins, Democratic lawmakers accuse the Fee of abandoning meritorious crypto instances because of strain from the more and more highly effective cryptocurrency business.
The Ripple lawsuit is emblematic of the SEC’s aggressive “regulation by enforcement” method underneath former Chair Gary Gensler. The long-lasting authorized battle formally ended on Dec. 22.
Since January 2025, the SEC has dismissed or closed at the very least a dozen crypto-related enforcement actions, together with instances in opposition to Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and Ripple.
Lawmakers argue that this sample will not be coincidental. They level to an unprecedented surge in crypto business lobbying and political donations. To Democrats, the timing creates what they describe as an “unmistakable inference” of pay-to-play.
Coinbase and Kraken adopted an analogous arc. In each instances, courts discovered that the SEC had plausibly alleged securities violations involving crypto tokens and platform operations. Each instances survived motions to dismiss. But each had been finally dropped in 2025 because of the SEC making an attempt to reform its method.
Democrats reserve their sharpest criticism for the SEC’s dealing with of the case in opposition to Justin Solar, founding father of Tron. The allegations in opposition to him had been later bolstered by parallel civil litigation and settlements with celeb promoters. But in February 2025, the SEC requested the courtroom to pause the case to discover settlement talks.
The timing, lawmakers argue, is alarming. Solar has poured tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} into White Home-affiliated crypto ventures. They warn that failing to pursue Solar aggressively would additional undermine belief within the SEC’s independence.
“The SEC’s case was not speculative or marginal—it was constructed on a rigorous investigation that resulted in detailed allegations of systematic securities violations confirmed by judicial rulings and co-defendant settlements. No antagonistic rulings or destructive developments had impaired the SEC’s place previous to the keep,” the letter says.

