BTQ’s Bitcoin Quantum Testnet and “Previous BTC” Danger, Defined

Key takeaways

• Bitcoin’s quantum threat facilities on uncovered public keys and signature safety.

• BTQ’s testnet explores post-quantum signatures in a Bitcoin-like atmosphere.

• Put up-quantum signatures considerably enhance transaction measurement and block area calls for.

• “Previous BTC threat” is concentrated in legacy output varieties and tackle reuse patterns.

BTQ Applied sciences stated it had launched a Bitcoin Quantum testnet on Jan. 12, 2026, a Bitcoin-like community designed to trial post-quantum signatures with out touching Bitcoin mainnet governance.

The thought is that BTQ would exchange Bitcoin’s present signature scheme with ML-DSA, the module-lattice signature normal formalized by the Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Know-how (NIST) as Federal Info Processing Normal (FIPS) 204, for post-quantum safety assumptions.

It’s price remembering that in most Bitcoin quantum-threat fashions, the important thing precondition is public-key publicity. If a public key’s already seen onchain, a sufficiently succesful future quantum laptop may, in idea, try to recuperate the corresponding personal key offline.

Do you know? BTQ Applied sciences is a research-focused agency engaged on post-quantum cryptography and blockchain safety. Its Bitcoin Quantum testnet is designed to check how quantum-resistant signatures behave in a Bitcoin-like system.

What quantum modifications?

Most Bitcoin quantum-risk discussions concentrate on digital signatures, not on Bitcoin’s coin provide or the concept a quantum laptop may magically guess random wallets.

The precise concern is {that a} cryptographically related quantum laptop (CRQC) may run Shor’s algorithm to unravel the discrete logarithm drawback effectively sufficient to derive a personal key from a recognized public key, undermining each the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) and Schnorr-based signing.

Chaincode Labs frames this because the dominant quantum risk mannequin for Bitcoin as a result of it may allow unauthorized spending by producing legitimate signatures.

The chance might be separated into long-range publicity, the place public keys are already seen onchain for some older script varieties or as a result of reuse, and short-range publicity, the place public keys are revealed when a transaction is broadcast and awaits affirmation, making a slim time window.

In fact, no quantum laptop right now poses an instantaneous threat to Bitcoin, and mining-related impacts needs to be handled as a separate and extra constrained dialogue in contrast with signature breakage.

Do you know? Shor’s algorithm already exists as arithmetic, nevertheless it requires a big, fault-tolerant quantum laptop to run. If such machines are constructed, they could possibly be used to derive personal keys from uncovered public keys.

What BTQ constructed and why it’s attention-grabbing

BTQ’s Bitcoin Quantum testnet is basically a Bitcoin Core-based fork that swaps out one in every of Bitcoin’s most necessary primitives, signatures.

In its announcement, BTQ stated the testnet replaces ECDSA with ML-DSA, the module-lattice signature scheme standardized by the NIST as FIPS 204 for post-quantum digital signatures.

This modification forces a set of engineering trade-offs. ML-DSA signatures are roughly 38-72 occasions bigger than ECDSA, so the testnet raises the block measurement restrict to 64 mebibytes (MiB) to make room for the extra transaction information.

The corporate additionally treats the community as a full lifecycle proving floor, supporting pockets creation, transaction signing and verification, and mining, together with primary infrastructure similar to a block explorer and mining pool.

In brief, the testnet’s sensible worth is that it turns post-quantum Bitcoin right into a efficiency and coordination experiment.

The place outdated BTC threat concentrates

When analysts discuss “outdated BTC threat” in a post-quantum context, they’re normally referring to public keys which are already uncovered onchain.

A future CRQC able to operating Shor’s algorithm may, in idea, use these public keys to derive the corresponding personal keys after which produce legitimate spends.

There are three output varieties instantly weak to long-range assaults, particularly as a result of they place elliptic-curve public keys immediately within the locking script (ScriptPubKey): Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK), Pay-to-Multi-Signature (P2MS) and Pay-to-Taproot (P2TR).

The distribution is uneven:

• P2PK is a tiny share of right now’s unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs), round 0.025%, nevertheless it locks a disproportionate share of BTC worth, about 8.68% or 1,720,747 Bitcoin (BTC), largely dormant Satoshi-era cash.

• P2MS accounts for about 1.037% of UTXOs, however studies estimate that it secures solely round 57 BTC.

• P2TR is frequent by depend, round 32.5% of UTXOs, but small by worth in the identical snapshot, about 0.74% or 146,715 BTC. Its publicity is tied to Taproot’s key-path design, the place a tweaked public key’s seen onchain.

Tackle reuse may flip what would in any other case be “spend-time” publicity into long-range publicity as a result of as soon as a public key seems onchain, it stays seen.

BTQ’s personal messaging makes use of this exposed-key framing to argue that the possibly affected pool is giant. It cites 6.26 million BTC as uncovered, which is a part of why the corporate says testing post-quantum signatures in a Bitcoin-like atmosphere is price doing now.

What’s subsequent for Bitcoin?

Within the close to time period, probably the most concrete work is observability and preparedness.

As explored, the signature risk mannequin is pushed by public-key publicity. For this reason discussions usually middle on how Bitcoin’s present pockets and scripting practices both reveal public keys early, as with some legacy script varieties, or scale back publicity by default, as with frequent pockets habits that avoids reuse.

“Previous BTC threat” is subsequently largely a property of historic output varieties and reuse patterns and never one thing that out of the blue applies evenly to each coin.

The second, extra sensible constraint is capability. Even when a post-quantum migration have been socially agreed upon, it could nonetheless be a blockspace and coordination drawback.

River’s explainer summarizes tutorial estimates displaying how delicate timelines are to assumptions. A theoretical situation wherein all transactions are migrations can compress timelines dramatically, whereas extra lifelike blockspace allocation stretches a transition into years, even earlier than accounting for governance and adoption.

BTQ’s testnet suits into that bucket. It lets engineers observe the operational prices of post-quantum signatures, together with bigger information sizes and totally different limits, in a Bitcoin-like setting, with out claiming that Bitcoin is imminently breakable.

Do you know? The largest issue holding quantum computer systems again is noise, or errors. In the present day’s qubits make errors steadily, so fault-tolerant error correction is required. This implies utilizing many bodily qubits to supply a small variety of dependable “logical” qubits earlier than operating the lengthy computations wanted to interrupt real-world cryptography.

What Bitcoin-level mitigation may appear to be

On the protocol degree, quantum preparedness is commonly mentioned as a sequenced path.

Put up-quantum signature schemes are typically a lot bigger than elliptic-curve signatures, which have knock-on results for transaction measurement, bandwidth and verification prices; the identical sorts of trade-offs BTQ is surfacing by experimenting with ML-DSA.

That’s the reason some Bitcoin proposals focus first on decreasing probably the most structural publicity inside present script designs, with out committing the community to a selected post-quantum signature algorithm instantly.

A latest instance is Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal (BIP) 360, which proposes a brand new output kind known as Pay-to-Tapscript-Hash (P2TSH). P2TSH is almost an identical to Taproot however removes the key-path spend, the trail that depends on elliptic-curve signatures, leaving a tapscript-native route that can be utilized in methods meant to keep away from that key-path dependency.

Associated concepts have circulated on the Bitcoin developer mailing listing underneath the broader “hash-only” or “script-spend” Taproot household, usually mentioned as Pay-to-Quantum-Resistant-Hash (P2QRH)-style constructions. These proposals once more goal to reuse Taproot’s construction whereas skipping the quantum-vulnerable key spend.

Importantly, none of that is settled. The principle level is that Bitcoin’s probably response, if it strikes, is debated as an incremental coordination drawback that balances conservatism, compatibility and the price of altering the transaction format.

The BTQ testnet is kind of revealing

BTQ’s Bitcoin Quantum testnet doesn’t settle the quantum debate, nevertheless it does make two factors more durable to disregard.

First, most credible risk fashions concentrate on the place public keys are already uncovered, which is why “outdated coin” patterns preserve showing in analyses.

Second, post-quantum Bitcoin is an engineering and coordination drawback. BTQ Applied sciences’ personal design decisions, similar to transferring to ML-DSA and lifting block limits to accommodate a lot bigger signatures, illustrate these trade-offs.

Finally, the testnet is a sandbox for measuring prices and constraints and shouldn’t be seen as proof that Bitcoin is imminently breakable.