The variety of Bitcoin (BTC) nodes signaling help for Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal 110 (BIP-110), a short lived smooth fork limiting the quantity of information included in every transaction on the consensus stage, rose to 2.38%.
583 out of 24,481 nodes are working BIP-110, and the first node software program implementation for working the smooth fork proposal is Bitcoin Knots, in keeping with The Bitcoin Portal.
BIP-110 limits the scale of transaction outputs to 34 bytes and caps the OP_RETURN knowledge restrict to 83 bytes. The short-term smooth fork will likely be deployed for 1 12 months, with potential extension or alteration after the 1-year time period, in keeping with the proposal’s GitHub web page.
OP_RETURN is a script code that enables customers to embed arbitrary knowledge and has been the topic of intense debate inside the Bitcoin neighborhood following the discharge of Bitcoin Core model 30, the newest improve of essentially the most extensively used Bitcoin node software program.
The OP_RETURN restrict was capped at 83 bytes, which Bitcoin Core builders unilaterally eliminated in Bitcoin Core model 30, following a controversial pull request, first proposed in April 2025. The proposal was usually opposed by the Bitcoin neighborhood.
Associated: Bitcoiners reject quantum computing fears as reason for value droop
The arbitrary knowledge difficulty creates a divide inside the Bitcoin neighborhood
The Bitcoin Core replace that eliminated the information restrict went stay in October 2025, sparking a torrent of unfavourable suggestions from critics, who say that eradicating the arbitrary knowledge restrict incentivizes spam on the Bitcoin ledger.
Arbitrary knowledge will increase the storage prices of working a Bitcoin node, and the prohibitive value results in elevated centralization of the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin nodes may be run on consumer-grade computer systems, not like high-throughput blockchains that generate massive portions of information and require specialised {hardware}.
Growing node {hardware} necessities undermines the Bitcoin protocol’s worth proposition of being a decentralized financial community, in keeping with critics. Bitcoin advocate and educator Matthew Kratter stated:
“It is like a kind of parasitical vegetation, like ivy, utterly overlaying a tree, consuming up the tree, after which the interior scaffolding collapses, and the ivy collapses as a result of it is mainly destroyed the construction. That is what spam has the potential to do to Bitcoin.”
Others like Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin Core contributor, help the uncapped OP_Return Restrict, arguing that filters do little to cease spam on the community.
Journal: Huge questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year energy outage?