In short
- Brookings says group resistance to AI information facilities is rising over electrical energy use, water consumption, and public subsidies.
- The report requires legally binding group profit agreements to spell out prices, advantages, and enforcement.
- Authors warn unresolved native opposition might sluggish or block future AI infrastructure tasks.
AI information facilities are increasing quickly throughout the U.S., however rising native resistance is rising as a possible roadblock for the infrastructure behind synthetic intelligence.
A brand new report from nonprofit assume tank Brookings warns that disputes over electrical energy use, water consumption, tax abatements, and environmental influence are more and more slowing or threatening information heart tasks. The authors say legally binding group profit agreements are needed to stop native opposition from constraining AI infrastructure progress.
“Knowledge facilities are each controversial and important to the unreal intelligence applied sciences undergirding the digital financial system,” the report mentioned. “With out considerable information facilities, the digital revolution might probably stall, proscribing entry to the advantages of digital applied sciences for people, communities, governments, and companies.”
The report comes as demand for computing energy ramps up and AI information facilities unfold nationwide, supported by the Trump administration. In January 2025, Trump introduced Stargate, a $500 billion AI infrastructure initiative backed by OpenAI and Oracle, and known as for long-term safeguards to make sure communities should not left with information facilities that ship little advantages.
In line with Shaolei Ren, an affiliate professor {of electrical} engineering on the College of California, Riverside, native considerations about water use, public well being, electrical energy prices, noise, and associated points are legitimate and ought to be addressed upfront earlier than building begins.
“In the end, the metric that actually issues is group satisfaction, and that’s what we ought to be optimizing for,” Ren instructed Decrypt. “There’s a rising recognition that group voices matter, and that information facilities ought to be deliberate and inbuilt alignment with native pursuits, not simply technical or financial goals.”
“After all, step one is measurement,” he added. “You can’t enhance what you don’t measure.”
Knowledge facilities are huge services that retailer and course of the huge quantities of knowledge required to run cloud computing and AI programs. In line with an October report by the Pew Analysis Middle, U.S. information facilities consumed about 183 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electrical energy in 2024, roughly equal to the mixed annual vitality demand of Pakistan.
The Brookings report mentioned the information heart enlargement comes amid a rising “techlash” towards the AI sector, pushed by anxieties over job displacement from automation, vitality consumption, and influence on the atmosphere, which has sparked protests and arranged opposition in communities across the nation.
“Left unchecked, these group considerations might decelerate the fast building of knowledge facilities, weaken AI progress, and sluggish AI income streams, all of which might restrict the AI advantages promised by tech companies and authorities officers,” the Brookings report mentioned.
Main tech companies, together with Amazon and Nvidia, have introduced multibillion-dollar investments to increase information heart and AI infrastructure, including to a world community that features practically 4,000 information facilities within the U.S. and about 10,700 worldwide, based on information from monitoring website Knowledge Middle Map.
A lot of that new improvement is concentrated within the American South, the place firms are constructing massive services in North Carolina, Georgia, Virginia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, and Tennessee. Native leaders and advocates argue that information facilities are being inbuilt low and middle-income areas that lack the political affect to cease them.
To raise environmental considerations, Brookings known as for legally binding group profit agreements, or CBAs, as a substitute for casual negotiations and undisclosed improvement contracts for information facilities.
The settlement, the report mentioned, ought to outline prices, subsidies, and tax revenues, whereas setting enforceable commitments for jobs, electrical energy and water use, and air pollution.
“Properly-crafted group profit agreements can deal with public considerations and mitigate identified issues of knowledge facilities,” Brookings wrote. “Larger transparency on every of those fronts would assist assuage the troubles of the American public.”
Every day Debrief Publication
Begin every single day with the highest information tales proper now, plus authentic options, a podcast, movies and extra.

