FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried has launched a recent public marketing campaign on X that seems geared toward reinforcing his request for a brand new trial. Nonetheless, a number of of the claims he’s utilizing to argue his innocence battle with courtroom data and established info.
The posts, revealed days after filings looking for a retrial, body Bankman-Fried as a sufferer of politically motivated “lawfare,” alleging misconduct by prosecutors, judicial bias, and retaliation towards former FTX executives.
But, a overview of the claims exhibits repeated factual errors and logical gaps.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Claims of Gag Orders and Judicial Bias
Bankman-Fried claims each he and Donald Trump had been “gagged” by Decide Lewis Kaplan.
Courtroom data present this comparability is inaccurate. Kaplan presided over Trump’s civil defamation case and imposed courtroom conduct limits, not a proper public gag order.
In actuality, Trump’s legal gag orders had been issued by different judges in unrelated instances.
In distinction, Bankman-Fried was topic to a legal gag order after repeated violations of pretrial launch circumstances — a regular judicial response.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Repeating Solvency Arguments Rejected at Trial
Bankman-Fried once more asserts that FTX “was at all times solvent” and that prosecutors falsely claimed buyer funds had been stolen.
That argument was central to his protection at trial and was rejected by a jury, which discovered that buyer belongings had been misused and misrepresented.
Additionally, federal courts have constantly dominated that post-collapse asset recoveries don’t retroactively set up solvency on the time of misuse.
Sponsored
Mischaracterizing Prosecutorial Actions
Bankman-Fried additionally claims Trump “fired” one among his prosecutors, former SDNY official Danielle Sassoon.
Public data present Sassoon resigned after refusing a DOJ directive in an unrelated corruption case. She was not dismissed, and her departure had no direct connection to the FTX prosecution.
Linking DOJ Actions to Politics and Crypto Regulation
A number of posts allege the Biden administration focused him as a result of he opposed Gary Gensler, donated to Republicans, and represented crypto pursuits.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Whereas Bankman-Fried was energetic in Washington, no courtroom filings or rulings have supported claims that political donations or regulatory lobbying drove the prosecution.
Judges dominated the case on documentary proof, inner messages, and witness testimony.
Actually, the FTX founder himself instantly donated to Joe Biden’s marketing campaign.
Bankman-Fried additionally defends former FTX co-CEO Ryan Salame, claiming he was coerced into pleading responsible and barred from presenting exculpatory proof.
Salame pleaded responsible to marketing campaign finance and money-transmission violations and has acknowledged these pleas in courtroom. His sentencing file exhibits no judicial discovering that proof was unlawfully suppressed.