Bitcoin developer Matt Corallo pushed again on claims that quantum computing fears are behind bitcoin’s newest drawdown.
He stated on Laura Shin’s Unchained podcast that if buyers had been significantly pricing in near-term quantum danger, Ether would doubtless be outperforming bitcoin quite than falling alongside it.
Bitcoin is down about 46% from its October all-time excessive close to $126,100 to round $67,000, whereas Ether is down about 58% since an early-October market crash.
Why Corallo rejects the quantum narrative
Corallo advised the podcast:
“I strongly disagree with the characterization that Bitcoin’s present worth is materially, due to some sort of quantum danger.”
He added that market members don’t seem to view quantum computing as a direct risk, and recommended some Bitcoiners are in search of a scapegoat for weak worth motion.
Ethereum highlights post-quantum work
The feedback come as some customers criticize Bitcoin builders for not transferring quick sufficient towards quantum resistance.
Corallo argued bitcoin is now “competing for capital” towards different applied sciences in a manner it didn’t beforehand, pointing to synthetic intelligence as a serious, capital-intensive funding theme.
Not everybody agrees
Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards stated at Cointelegraph’s LONGITUDE occasion on Feb. 12 that quantum danger ought to be discounted into bitcoin’s worth till the difficulty is solved.
BlackRock additionally up to date the registration assertion for its iShares Bitcoin ETF to flag quantum computing as a possible danger to the integrity of the Bitcoin community.