The US Workplace of the Comptroller of the Foreign money (OCC) has dropped a 376‑web page proposal to implement the Guiding and Establishing Nationwide Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act that appears to settle the continuing stablecoin yield combat.
The proposal is open to public remark for 60 days from Wednesday’s publication date, and units out detailed guidelines for permitted cost stablecoin issuers underneath the OCC’s jurisdiction.
Supervised entities could be barred from paying any type of curiosity or yield, whether or not in money, tokens or different consideration, “solely in reference to the holding, use, or retention” of a cost stablecoin, per part 4(a)(11) of the GENIUS Act.
Thania Charmani, associate at world legislation agency Winston & Strawn, commented on X that the OCC proposed to “resolve the talk on stablecoin yield by way of rulemaking,” doubtlessly clearing the best way for the Digital Asset Market Readability Act of 2025 (CLARITY) to “proceed with out that provision.”
How the OCC proposal implements GENIUS on yield
GENIUS, enacted in July 2025, created a federal framework for cost stablecoins and restricted issuance within the US to licensed permitted issuers similar to financial institution subsidiaries, new federal stablecoin issuers, and sure giant state‑regulated companies.
The OCC’s draft rule interprets that statutory framework into operational constraints, together with tight limits on how GENIUS‑regulated issuers can construction economics round their stablecoins.
The proposal goes a step additional, including a rebuttable presumption that an issuer is violating the ban on paying yield if it has an association to pay yield to an affiliate or “associated third occasion” and that entity then pays yield to holders of the issuer’s cost stablecoin.
Associated: Ripple CEO confirms White Home assembly between crypto, banking reps
Issuers can attempt to rebut the presumption by submitting written supplies to the OCC, however the company stresses the “shut nexus” between issuer funds and finish‑holder yield and frames such constructions as “extremely probably” makes an attempt to evade the statute.
The proposal additionally attracts two express carve‑outs. It “will not be supposed to stop” retailers from independently providing reductions for utilizing cost stablecoins, and it doesn’t bar an issuer from sharing income from the stablecoin with a non‑affiliate associate in a whitelabel association.
What the proposal means for CLARITY and Coinbase
If the OCC’s proposed rule is finalized as drafted, it will have direct implications for the separate CLARITY Act debate over stablecoin rewards.
CLARITY drafts have centered on whether or not digital asset service suppliers needs to be allowed to pay yield or rewards on cost stablecoin balances, some extent of rivalry that has already induced friction from trade stakeholders, together with Coinbase.
By utilizing GENIUS implementation to ban yield on the issuer stage, the banking facet of the framework successfully establishes a no‑yield baseline for GENIUS‑compliant cost stablecoins.
For Coinbase and comparable corporations which have argued they need to have the ability to provide yield on stablecoin balances whereas working inside a completely regulated US framework, the message is obvious:
Stablecoin yield and GENIUS‑compliant, OCC‑supervised cost stablecoins are being placed on reverse sides of a regulatory line.
Huge Questions: Is China hoarding gold so yuan turns into world reserve as a substitute of USD?