In a Friday op-ed, Lionel Laurent, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, argues that MicroStrategy’s debt-for-Bitcoin technique won’t be viable in the long run.
Laurent not too long ago recalled the truth that Citron Analysis had disclosed a brief place within the firm, making its shares plunge by greater than 16%.
As reported by U.As we speak, MicroStrategy not too long ago turned one of many prime 100 greatest public firms within the U.S., rivaling the likes of chip big Intel.
The corporate has managed to extend its valuation by roughly 50 instances since making an unorthodox transfer to undertake Bitcoin as its treasury reserve asset.
MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin play depends on leveraging low-cost debt to safe extra cash for funding future purchases. As reported by U.As we speak, it not too long ago accomplished one other $3 billion providing of convertible notes, whereas its complete Bitcoin holdings have grown far above the $30 billion mark.
This audacious technique, nonetheless, is fraught with numerous dangers, based on Laurent. A large Bitcoin worth crash is the obvious threat talked about by the columnist. Such a state of affairs might result in asset gross sales and write-downs for the red-hot firm.
Even when Bitcoin avoids a significant worth crash, MicroStrategy might nonetheless be in bother because of its huge premium relative to NAV.
Saylor, who isn’t any stranger to dramatic crashes and comebacks after famously shedding $6 billion in a day in 2000, is seemingly unfazed by rising skepticism.
“The primary threat you are taking is the existential threat that Bitcoin has an extinction-level occasion and goes to zero instantly tomorrow,” Saylor mentioned throughout a latest CNBC interview. Nonetheless, MicroStrategy traders have accepted that threat, based on Saylor.