Gold advocate Peter Schiff issued a stark warning on financial coverage and sparked recent debate about Bitcoin’s perceived shortage. In a pair of high-profile posts on July 12, Schiff criticized the present Fed price stance and challenged the logic behind Bitcoin’s 21 million provide cap.
Schiff pointed to rising hypothesis that Fed Chair Jerome Powell might resign as early as Monday. If confirmed, this might open the door for President Trump to put in a brand new Fed chief prepared to slash rates of interest to the 1.25%–1.5% vary—down from the present 4.25%–4.5%.
Trump has brazenly referred to as for that concentrate on vary, citing the necessity to revive progress. Schiff argues such a transfer would “nail the coffin shut on the greenback,” triggering a spike in long-term yields, shopper costs, and gold. His message to followers was blunt: straightforward cash now means inflation chaos later.
Schiff: Bitcoin provide cap is psychological, not structural
In a separate tweet, Schiff challenged the importance of Bitcoin’s 21 million provide cap. He proposed a thought experiment: what if there have been 21 billion BTC as a substitute, every divisible into 100,000 satoshis as a substitute of 100 million?
Schiff argued that the variety of bitcoins is bigoted—the true shortage lies within the complete satoshi provide, which stays fastened no matter how BTC items are outlined. “Bitcoin’s provide is definitely meaningless,” he wrote. “It’s the satoshi provide that counts.”
His remark reignited a long-standing debate in crypto circles: does psychological framing matter greater than technical shortage?