The U.S. Division of Commerce has begun publishing GDP information to varied blockchains, together with Bitcoin, in a bid to indicate its dedication to being the “crypto capital of the world.”
This transfer has drawn sharp criticism from Bitcoin commentator Marty Bent, who sees it as a political gesture relatively than a significant technological development.
Blockchain information vs. protocol reality
Bent contends that embedding GDP information onto a blockchain is essentially misguided. He writes:
“It’s fairly clearly a ineffective advantage sign that misses the aim of ‘blockchain expertise’; present the world with immutable reality through a decentralized, permissionless peer-to-peer community.”
He additional explains that Bitcoin’s community solely ensures the validity of information that’s native to its protocol, akin to balances and transfers, not exterior info like GDP statistics.
“Making an attempt to anchor information that’s exogenous to the community and declare ‘immutable reality’ is actually unattainable.”
Exterior information can’t be verified
The article questions the safety and reliability of publishing authorities statistics on blockchains. Bent asks:
“How can we assure that the federal government gained’t publish incorrect GDP information by chance or make revisions to that information it has to amend sooner or later? We will’t.”
He factors out that present strategies—publishing information on-line—are easier and more cost effective than blockchain-based options.
Actual strategic bitcoin coverage
As a substitute of symbolic gestures, Bent urges policymakers to concentrate on substantive bitcoin methods.
He recommends that the federal government contemplate constructing a strategic bitcoin reserve, help bitcoin-related advantages, and use underutilized power belongings for bitcoin mining.
“If the Division of Commerce actually desires to make a non-virtue sign gesture to bitcoiners they might get critical about constructing a strategic bitcoin reserve.”
miners as high-tech heaters
The piece consists of commentary from Tyler Stevens, who reframes bitcoin mining as a type of superior electrical heating. Stevens says:
“100% of that power you push by your desktop or your laptop computer… it doesn’t have a display… all that electrical energy used to mine is transformed into warmth.”
This view emphasizes the real-world utility of mining and stands in distinction to the federal government’s concentrate on blockchain as a buzzword.