Coinbase is taking three US states to courtroom in a bid to lock in federal safety for its deliberate prediction markets, opening a brand new entrance within the battle over whether or not occasion contracts are finance or playing.
The alternate has sued regulators in Connecticut, Illinois, and Michigan, asking federal judges to declare that prediction markets listed on a US Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC)-regulated platform fall underneath the Commodity Change Act (CEA) and the CFTC’s unique jurisdiction, not 50 separate state playing codes.
In a Friday X put up, chief authorized officer Paul Grewal stated Coinbase filed the circumstances “to substantiate what is evident: prediction markets fall squarely underneath the jurisdiction of the @CFTC, not any particular person state gaming regulator (not to mention 50).”
Associated: Coinbase appoints former UK minister George Osborne to chair advisory council
Coinbase’s federalism problem to state playing legal guidelines
Coinbase frames the dispute as each a authorized and structural query. Court docket filings argue that if every state can independently determine whether or not federally supervised prediction markets are unlawful playing, essentially the most restrictive regime would successfully turn into the nationwide customary, “turning our system of federalism the other way up.”
The corporate additionally leans arduous on the way in which Congress outlined “commodity” within the CEA, noting that lawmakers selected to carve out solely a handful of particular underliers, notably onions and “movement‑image field‑workplace receipts,” somewhat than sports activities or politics.
Grewal attracts a transparent line between Coinbase’s deliberate markets and conventional sportsbooks. Casinos and bookmakers, he argues, revenue from buyer losses and set odds to maximise their winnings. Prediction markets, alternatively, are impartial matching engines that pair consumers and sellers and are detached to cost.
Treating each as the identical factor, Coinbase says, wouldn’t solely misinterpret the statute but additionally smother a federally regulated product that’s imagined to stay contained in the derivatives framework, with CFTC surveillance and place limits.
Associated: Coinbase provides inventory buying and selling, prediction markets in ‘every little thing app’ push
Kalshi’s combined document exhibits what’s at stake for prediction markets
Kalshi, which already operates as a CFTC‑designated contract marketplace for occasion contracts, has been testing that concept in courtroom for nearly a yr. It has sued or been sued in not less than six states over whether or not its sports activities and occasion markets are CFTC‑regulated derivatives or unlicensed playing.
Outcomes thus far are combined. In Nevada and Maryland, judges have held that Kalshi is topic to state gaming oversight regardless of its CFTC standing, whereas in New Jersey and, extra just lately, Connecticut, federal courts have granted the corporate short-term safety from enforcement whereas they weigh broader injunctions. Massachusetts, in the meantime, has sued to dam Kalshi’s sports activities merchandise, with an injunction determination not anticipated till early 2026.
With Coinbase now successfully adopting Kalshi’s pre‑emption playbook, the mixed docket might pressure federal courts to reply the core query each companies have been circling. Are US prediction markets going to be handled as regulated monetary devices underneath the CEA, or as playing merchandise that stay or die underneath state legislation?