Close Menu
Cryprovideos
    What's Hot

    CZ Says Purchase-and-Maintain Isn’t for Each Token After Dealer Backlash

    January 28, 2026

    Tether Confirms Large, Below-The-Radar $4,810,562,298 Gold Buy: Report – The Day by day Hodl

    January 28, 2026

    Wall Avenue’s huge lie about 24-hour buying and selling ignores the $4.5 billion crypto market that by no means really closes its doorways

    January 28, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Cryprovideos
    • Home
    • Crypto News
    • Bitcoin
    • Altcoins
    • Markets
    Cryprovideos
    Home»Crypto News»FSC Chair Defends Proposed Crypto Alternate Possession Caps in South Korea
    FSC Chair Defends Proposed Crypto Alternate Possession Caps in South Korea
    Crypto News

    FSC Chair Defends Proposed Crypto Alternate Possession Caps in South Korea

    By Crypto EditorJanuary 28, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    South Korea’s high monetary regulator stated crypto exchanges ought to face possession limits just like these utilized to securities markets, signaling a tougher public stance on governance reforms below the nation’s proposed Digital Asset Fundamental Act.

    Based on a report by The Korea Occasions, the Monetary Companies Fee (FSC) Chair Lee Eog-weon stated licensed crypto exchanges ought to now not be handled as strange non-public corporations however as entities with public-infrastructure traits. 

    Lee’s feedback come because the FSC opinions a proposal to cap main shareholders’ stakes in crypto exchanges at round 15% to twenty%, a measure that has drawn resistance from alternate operators and raised issues inside the ruling Democratic Celebration.

    Whereas the possession cap has been below dialogue for weeks, Lee’s remarks are the clearest backing but from the FSC, signaling its choice to press forward with stricter governance requirements as platforms transfer towards a proper authorization regime. 

    Possession caps transfer from coverage draft to public protection

    The possession restrict was outlined earlier this month in a coverage coordination doc submitted to the Nationwide Meeting as a part of preparations for the Digital Asset Fundamental Act, based on Yonhap Information Company. 

    The report described exchanges as “core infrastructure” for the digital asset market and argued that concentrated possession might undermine market integrity. 

    Underneath the proposal, crypto exchanges would shift from a notification system that requires renewal each three years to an authorization regime granting extra sturdy working standing.

    Associated: Why South Korea is struggling to determine who can situation stablecoins

    Lee stated that the shift warrants governance guidelines aligned with securities exchanges and different buying and selling programs. This contains possession caps and suitability opinions. 

    Home exchanges reportedly warned that such limits might disrupt present possession constructions.

    The Korea Occasions reported that Dunamu Chair Music Chi-hyung and associated events maintain greater than 28% of the corporate’s shares, whereas Coinone founder Cha Myung-hoon controls a majority stake of 53% from the alternate.

    If enacted, the possession cap would probably pressure restructuring at a number of the nation’s largest exchanges and will have an effect on their means to draw or retain strategic shareholders.

    Associated: South Korea’s central financial institution flags FX dangers as lawmakers debate stablecoin issuance

    Stablecoin capital requirement set at $3.7 million

    Lawmakers signaled that the proposal remains to be being negotiated. Based on a report by the Maeil Enterprise Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Celebration plans to introduce the Digital Asset Fundamental Act earlier than the Lunar New Yr vacation on Feb. 17. 

    Nonetheless, delicate subjects, together with the shareholder caps and the central financial institution’s function, stay below last coordination. 

    The invoice had already skilled prior delays due to disagreements over stablecoin issuer oversight issues.

    Maeil reported that lawmakers agreed on different components of the invoice, together with setting a minimal capital requirement of 5 billion gained ($3.7 million) for stablecoin issuers, however acknowledged that possession caps stay one of the vital contentious provisions. 

    The invoice would nonetheless have to clear committee evaluate and a Nationwide Meeting vote earlier than changing into regulation.