TD Cowen stated a US digital asset market construction invoice is unlikely to advance with out President Donald Trump’s direct involvement, citing unresolved trade disputes and a troublesome path to profitable Senate Democratic assist.
Why TD Cowen says Trump should intervene
Jaret Seiberg, a managing director at TD Cowen’s Washington Analysis Group, wrote in a Monday notice that Trump might have to personally push banks and bitcoin trade teams into compromise.
Seiberg’s feedback got here as White Home bitcoin and digital belongings adviser David Sacks was set to host a gathering with banking commerce teams, digital asset commerce teams, and Coinbase.
Stablecoin rewards stay the sticking level
The assembly is predicted to give attention to how stablecoin rewards ought to be handled within the Senate Banking Committee.
Banks have warned that permitting platforms to pay rewards with out clear limits may pull deposits away from the standard banking system, notably neighborhood banks.
Some corporations, together with Coinbase, have argued the problem is getting used to restrict competitors and say the query was already addressed throughout negotiations across the GENIUS Act, which was signed into legislation final July.
Oversight and competitors issues
Seiberg stated funds on stablecoins are “inevitable,” however the important thing questions are when platforms could be granted that authority and what regulatory oversight they’d settle for.
He additionally pointed to stress throughout the trade, arguing authorized ambiguity has acted as a barrier to entry that may profit incumbents.
Democrats’ calls for would be the larger hurdle
Seiberg stated the bigger impediment could also be securing sufficient Democratic votes within the Senate, the place as much as 10 Democrats may very well be wanted.
He stated Democrats are anticipated to push for stronger investor protections, more durable anti-money-laundering and Financial institution Secrecy Act requirements, and stricter conflict-of-interest guidelines.
Seiberg additionally flagged calls for to bar the president, senior officers, and their households from proudly owning or controlling digital asset entities, noting added sensitivity after a Wall Avenue Journal report alleging a $500 million funding tied to Trump-linked World Liberty Monetary.
Seiberg concluded:
“Our view is that it’s going to require President Trump’s private intervention to pressure the crypto and banking industries to make the compromises wanted for crypto market construction laws to have an opportunity of advancing in Congress.”