MicroStrategy co-founder Michael Saylor says Bitcoin (BTC) has gained the worldwide narrative struggle, however flags BIP-110 protocol modifications because the asset’s best remaining risk.
In the meantime, Bitcoin Convention organizer David Bailey extends an invite to BIP-110 supporters, invigorating debate that has cut up the Bitcoin group into opposing camps.
BIP-110 is a proposal to vary how new Bitcoin blocks are chosen by permitting miners to vote on which legitimate block to just accept, relatively than strictly following the longest-chain rule.
In easy phrases, it tries to make Bitcoin’s consensus extra versatile and proof against sure mining assaults.
Why the BIP-110 Debate Issues Now
Saylor argues that the BTC worth is now pushed by institutional capital flows relatively than halving cycles.
He describes the four-year cycle as “lifeless” and emphasised that financial institution lending and digital credit score will form Bitcoin’s development going ahead.
Nevertheless, probably the most provocative line focused protocol growth. The MicroStrategy govt calls “dangerous concepts driving iatrogenic protocol modifications” the only greatest threat to Bitcoin.
“Iatrogenic” is a medical time period that means hurt attributable to medical examination, remedy, or recommendation from well being professionals.
That warning lands squarely on the BIP-110 controversy. The Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal, launched by developer Dathon Ohm and backed by the Bitcoin Knots group, seeks a brief one-year mushy fork to limit non-monetary information in Bitcoin transactions.
It targets Ordinals inscriptions, BRC-20 tokens, and enormous OP_RETURN payloads that critics say bloat the blockchain and burden node operators.
A Group Break up in Two
The primary block signaling assist for BIP-110 was mined by the Ocean pool in March 2026.
Proponents body it as a needed protection of Bitcoin’s identification as sound cash. They argue that arbitrary information competes unfairly with funds and drives up charges for unusual customers.
Opponents see a unique image solely. Blockstream CEO Adam Again warned that consensus-level intervention may harm Bitcoin’s credibility as a retailer of worth.
He argued the proposal dangers setting a precedent for future transaction censorship.
The activation threshold itself stays contentious. BIP-110 proposes a 55% hash energy requirement, far beneath the standard 95% consensus normal for Bitcoin upgrades.
Bailey, CEO and Chairman of Nakamoto and founding father of BTC Inc., acknowledged his personal position in mocking BIP-110 supporters on-line.
A number of BIP-110 supporters dismissed the gesture as a PR transfer tied to ticket gross sales relatively than real bridge-building.
However, the Bitcoin 2026 Convention and a Federal Reserve assembly are each scheduled for late April, making a dense catalyst window for BTC.
The BIP-110 signaling course of stays energetic, with a possible activation choice approaching later in 2026.
It’s a contest over whether or not Bitcoin ought to stay a minimal financial instrument or enable broader on-chain experimentation.
The submit Michael Saylor Calls BIP-110 Bitcoin’s Greatest Self-Inflicted Threat appeared first on BeInCrypto.