Veteran dealer and classical chartist Peter Brandt has rejected the narrative that Bitcoin’s present multi-month consolidation is a “bull flag.”
Brandt has cautioned market contributors in opposition to making up their very own charting guidelines merely to suit a bullish bias.
Charting guidelines
Brandt took to X (previously Twitter) to deal with the rising refrain of retail merchants and analysts who’ve been labeling BTC’s latest upward-sloping worth channel as a basic continuation sample.
“Meant to be instructional right here, not insulting, however newbies to cost charting have the tendency to make up guidelines as they go,” Brandt posted.
Veteran Chartist Brandt Rejects Bitcoin Bull Flag Narrative
Bitcoin Pushes 200-Day Return to $87,000 Amid Quantum Fears, XRP Worth’s Uncommon Double-Backside Alternative Seems, Binance Lists Microsoft and Alibaba on TradFi Roaster: Morning Crypto Report
He has burdened that the definitive mechanics of technical evaluation had been established many years in the past by market pioneers like Richard W. Schabacker (1934) and Robert D. Edwards and John Magee, authors of the 1948 definitive information Technical Evaluation of Inventory Developments. Trendy commentators may take a look at Bitcoin’s present chart and see a flag, Brandt famous: “However not the founders of charting, thus not me.”
In response to classical charting ideas, a reliable flag or pennant sample should full its formation and escape inside a strict four-week window.
True flags are characterised by a quick, high-momentum pause (typically described as flying at “half-mast”) earlier than a previous aggressive development resumes. Patterns that stretch into eight or ten weeks could assume the visible form of a flag, however merchants ought to completely not anticipate them to operate like one.
The present market construction reveals a uneven, upward-sloping parallel channel that started forming in late February. This particular channel has been grinding alongside for roughly seven weeks.
Extended channel constructions can utterly fail to interrupt out (as evidenced by the asset’s prior worth motion).

