Michael Saylor’s newest transfer to finance extra Bitcoin purchases has reignited debate over the viability of his high-stakes method. The corporate now known as Technique (previously MicroStrategy) introduced it might concern a brand new perpetual most well-liked inventory, STRF (“Strife”), at a ten% annual dividend. Whereas some see this as an creative method to accumulate extra BTC, others warn the money dividend obligations may turn out to be untenable if Bitcoin costs plummet.
Might Saylor Be The Subsequent Bitcoin Bear Market Catalyst?
On X, Technique introduced the creation of STRF (Strife), which it described as a “new perpetual most well-liked inventory providing, accessible to institutional traders and choose non-institutional traders.” In its assertion, the corporate defined that proceeds would go towards normal company functions—together with working capital—“and the acquisition of Bitcoin,” though it burdened this remained “topic to market and different circumstances.”
In response to Technique, STRF carries cumulative dividends of 10% yearly, with the primary money dividend scheduled for June 30, 2025, after which every quarter thereafter. Observers rapidly famous how such a excessive payout may pressure the agency’s assets, on condition that its stability sheet is closely tilted towards Bitcoin somewhat than conventional income streams.
Among the many early critics was WhalePanda (@WhalePanda), co-host of the Magical Crypto Mates YouTube channel with Riccardo Spagni, Samson Mow, and Charlie Lee. He argued the ten% dividend, which may quantity to $50 million in annual payouts if Technique raises $500 million, is just too massive given the corporate’s construction:
“I’ve stated it earlier than that Saylor goes to deliver the subsequent Bitcoin bear market. This appears determined. 10% dividend on $500 million interprets to $50 million yearly, payable solely in money… they don’t have that money.”
One other vocal critic, Simon Dixon—an ex-investment banker turned Bitcoin investor identified for backing platforms like Kraken, Bitfinex, and BitStamp—drew a pointy parallel between Technique’s daring transfer and the infamous collapse of Lengthy-Time period Capital Administration (LTCM) within the late Nineteen Nineties. Though not equating the 2 situations outright, Dixon argued that providing such a excessive fastened dividend from “inadequate greenback income” resembled a “next-level danger.”
He cautioned: “Technique’s announcement of a perpetual 10% dividend paid in {dollars}—regardless of missing enough greenback income & working with a Bitcoin-based stability sheet—is next-level danger. That is beginning to resemble Lengthy-Time period Capital Administration, which required a bailout. If this ship sinks, nationalization may turn out to be a strategic transfer for the US authorities. For readability, this doesn’t change my thesis on Bitcoin.”
Not everybody shares the dire outlook. Some trade figures insist that Saylor’s monitor document in rising Technique’s BTC reserves—and the relative simplicity of its stability sheet in comparison with LTCM—presents a considerable cushion. David Bailey, CEO of BTC Inc, argued that Saylor’s private dedication to Bitcoin shouldn’t be discounted: “Saylor actually has extra pores and skin within the recreation than anybody alive… In case you don’t just like the inventory, don’t purchase it, easy.”
He referred to critics as “ungrateful,” underscoring how Saylor’s public advocacy and company purchases have introduced mainstream consideration—and appreciable inflows—to Bitcoin. Bitcoin analyst Dylan LeClair additionally dismissed the LTCM comparability, calling it “actually nothing like LTCM” and implying that Technique’s BTC-backed stability sheet doesn’t pose the identical systemic danger as a closely leveraged hedge fund dealing in derivatives.
Preston Pysh, co-founder of The Investor’s Podcast Community, provided a extra nuanced take. Whereas he expressed reservations concerning the new issuance—questioning why Technique didn’t make the most of “the earlier most well-liked issuance which has an 8% dividend yield and optionality for funds in widespread or money”—he considered direct parallels to LTCM as “excessive laughable.”
Pysh floated tough numbers suggesting that even when Bitcoin had been to tumble 70% from its present ranges, Technique may theoretically keep dividend and coupon funds for greater than a decade. He wrote:
“If the value of Bitcoin went down 70% from right here, he nonetheless has 12 billion USD price of Bitcoin on the stability sheet and 115M in annual CASH funds (dividends and coupons mixed) that have to be paid. That’s roughly 12 years price of fee stock on the stability sheet even with a 70% discount in BTC’s worth. Now this math is extraordinarily tough and I’ve put about 2 minutes price of effort into debunking this, so take it for what it’s price, however I believe your declare is hyperbolic.”
At press time, BTC traded at $83,454.
Featured picture created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Course of for bitcoinist is centered on delivering totally researched, correct, and unbiased content material. We uphold strict sourcing requirements, and every web page undergoes diligent evaluate by our group of high expertise consultants and seasoned editors. This course of ensures the integrity, relevance, and worth of our content material for our readers.