Crypto news report · source clearly identified
Tokenized Real‑World Assets Show 89% Idle Value Amid Low DeFi Utilization
DeFiLlama data shows that only $3.79 bn of the $34.6 bn tokenized RWA market is deployed in protocols, leaving about 89 % of issued value idle. Utilization varies widely by product and depends on legal, liquidity and pricing factors.

The on‑chain tokenized real‑world asset (RWA) market has reached $34.6 billion, but DeFiLlama reports that only $3.79 billion is actively used in decentralized finance protocols, meaning roughly 89 % of the issued value remains idle.
Utilization by Product
Utilization rates differ sharply between assets built for yield exposure and those designed as collateral.
- BlackRock’s BUIDL – 0.64 % utilization
- Franklin Templeton’s BENJI – 0 % utilization
- Circle’s USYC – 0.52 % utilization
- Centrifuge’s JAAA (Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Fund) – 97.97 % utilization
- Re Protocol’s reUSD – 97.87 % utilization
- Maple Finance’s SyrupUSDT – 88.84 % utilization
Why Utilization Varies
Artem Tolkachev, chief RWA officer at Falcon Finance, explains that a single utilization figure does not capture the full picture. He separates analysis into two levels:
- Asset level: redemption speed, legal claim quality, yield stability, and loss exposure after default.
- Use level: whether the token is held for yield, posted as margin on a centralized exchange, or supplied to a DeFi protocol.
Tokens intended for yield (e.g., money‑market fund wrappers) may have low protocol utilization while still fulfilling their purpose. In contrast, wrappers built specifically for borrowing should show higher on‑chain usage, and low utilization can signal weak adoption.
Falcon Finance’s Underwriting Process
Before accepting an RWA token as collateral, Falcon applies five tests:
- Legal claim assessment – does the token provide a perfected claim or an unsecured promise?
- Redemption terms – can holders exit quickly and at fair value?
- Secondary‑market liquidity – is there a viable buyer beyond redemption?
- Price‑feed robustness – can the valuation resist manipulation, especially when underlying markets are closed?
- Credit quality – ratings, duration, issuer exposure, and portfolio concentration.
If any test fails, the asset is not accepted as collateral, regardless of yield.
Challenges of Closed‑Market Assets
Many RWA tokens represent securities that trade only during limited hours (e.g., U.S. Treasuries, corporate credit, foreign sovereign bills). Falcon mitigates liquidation risk by applying larger haircuts, adding buffers for off‑hours price gaps, and discounting stale valuations.
Concentration of Underwriting Capacity
Only a few DeFi protocols have the expertise to evaluate structured credit and sovereign debt tokens. As a result, collateral‑focused assets like JAAA attract large TVL, while larger tokenized funds remain outside lending markets.
Expanding capacity will require common standards for legal rights, redemption processes, reliable price feeds, and transparent disclosures.
Source & attribution
News Source
- Publisher
- crypto.news
- Original date
- September 4, 2026, 8:54 PM
- Original headline
- Why 89% of tokenized RWAs remain idle despite a $34.6 billion market: Falcon exec explains