Bitcoin mining has lengthy been portrayed as dangerous to the local weather. Many argued that it wastes huge quantities of vitality, strains energy grids, and undermines international local weather objectives – claims which have turn out to be a typical a part of public debate.
Nonetheless, this narrative is more and more being challenged as extra knowledge and evaluation emerge. Claims that Bitcoin mining wastes vitality or destabilizes grids are contradicted by college analysis and real-world grid knowledge.
Debunking Bitcoin Mining Myths
ESG professional Daniel Batten has pushed again in opposition to misconceptions round Bitcoin mining whereas saying that many claims should not supported by proof and persist attributable to outdated assumptions. In his evaluation of Bitcoin and vitality use, Batten defined that the concept Bitcoin makes use of massive quantities of vitality, water, or digital waste per transaction is inaccurate, whereas pointing to a number of peer-reviewed research and Cambridge College analysis which have proven BTC’s useful resource consumption shouldn’t be pushed by transaction quantity.
Consequently, transaction exercise can scale with out rising vitality, water, or {hardware} use. He traces the origin of the “per transaction” narrative to a 2018 commentary by Alex de Vries, which he says was later debunked however broadly cited. That is what led to long-lasting misunderstandings.
On digital waste particularly, Batten cited 2025 Cambridge findings which present that earlier estimates overstated Bitcoin’s e-waste by greater than 1,200%. The researcher additionally disputed claims that Bitcoin mining destabilizes energy grids. As an alternative, he cited a rising physique of unbiased analysis that discovered that mining can as an alternative help grid stability attributable to its versatile and interruptible load profile, significantly on grids with excessive ranges of wind and photo voltaic.
In the meantime, research from Duke College and different researchers have discovered that Bitcoin mining can present grid balancing and ancillary providers, a conclusion Batten says is supported by real-world knowledge from Texas’ ERCOT grid. Based on ERCOT data, BTC mining has contributed to near-daily grid stabilization by demand response and frequency regulation, together with throughout excessive occasions such because the July 2022 Texas heatwave, whereas just one gentle destabilizing incident has been documented.
Electrified, Grid-Pleasant, and Cheaper
Batten even went on to problem the declare that Bitcoin mining raises electrical energy costs for customers, whereas mentioning US and Texas electrical energy price knowledge between 2021 and 2024 that present no irregular improve in areas with excessive mining exercise. He said that BTC mining can decrease system prices by monetizing extra renewable vitality, decreasing curtailment, deferring grid upgrades, and changing the necessity for added gasoline peaker vegetation.
Circumstances in Norway and Kenya present that Bitcoin mining has been linked to decrease electrical energy costs. On broader vitality comparisons, Batten echoes Cambridge College’s view that evaluating BTC’s vitality use to complete international locations is deceptive. He says local weather coverage is concentrated on altering how vitality is produced and managed, not merely chopping complete consumption.
He additional famous that BTC mining is absolutely electrified, extremely versatile, and able to decreasing methane emissions. Batten disputed claims that the crypto asset has an unusually excessive carbon footprint and indicated Cambridge estimates of about 39.8 MtCO2e in emissions, all from electrical energy use. Knowledge additionally revealed that Bitcoin mining has crossed a 50% sustainable vitality threshold globally.
The submit Bitcoin (BTC) Mining Isn’t the Local weather Villain Many Assume: ESG Skilled Says appeared first on CryptoPotato.