zkSync founder fires again at Canton’s ZK critique, exposing how Canton’s belief mannequin carries the identical systemic danger it warns about.
Canton’s founders have been telling consumers and regulators that zero-knowledge proofs are too dangerous for institutional finance.
zkSync co-founder Alex Gluchowski pushed again publicly this week. He argued that Canton’s critique collapses beneath scrutiny.
Worse, he mentioned Canton’s personal infrastructure fails the very check it units for others.
Learn additionally:
Visa to Deliver Privateness-Preserving Funds to Canton Community
ZK Proof Dangers and the Redundancy Downside in Blockchain Infrastructure
Canton’s argument facilities on complexity.
The agency claims ZKP bugs may go undetected as a result of underlying knowledge stays non-public. Undetected flaws then unfold throughout the community, creating systemic danger.
Gluchowski known as this reasoning flawed. He identified that the logic assumes any expertise is the one line of protection.
Aviation, nuclear methods, and medical units all run on software program that may fail. But they continue to be in use as a result of their architectures depend on redundancy and containment, not on the idea of perfection.
The actual query, he argued, is whether or not a system has a couple of line of protection.
Canton’s mannequin doesn’t. Its privateness and integrity layer relies upon solely on trusted operators segregating knowledge. There isn’t a cryptographic verification layer.
If operators are compromised, manipulated state strikes silently by way of the community with nothing to catch it.
Canton founders declare ZK proofs are too dangerous for institutional finance. They’ve been making this argument to consumers and regulators, publicly and behind closed doorways. It deserves a public reply.
Let’s examine if the argument holds — and if Canton’s infrastructure passes its personal…
— ALEX | ZK (@gluk64) March 27, 2026
Canton vs. Prividium: Evaluating Institutional Blockchain Safety Fashions
Gluchowski contrasted Canton’s setup with Prividium’s layered structure.
Prividium runs three impartial defenses. Institutional companions function nodes inside their very own regulated environments. Zero-knowledge proofs sit on high as a separate integrity verify.
And as ZK proof methods mature, a number of impartial provers can confirm the identical computation, so one flaw will get caught by one other.
Containment additionally works otherwise. Every Prividium occasion is a separate chain tied to 1 establishment.
Even when an attacker breaks into one establishment and finds a ZKP bug concurrently, the injury stays native. It can’t unfold throughout the broader community.
Gluchowski additionally challenged Canton’s reliance on DAML, its proprietary sensible contract language.
He famous that Ethereum’s EVM has survived over a decade of adversarial testing with a whole bunch of billions of {dollars} at stake.
DAML, in contrast, has a fraction of that scrutiny. Each vulnerability Ethereum already labored by way of nonetheless lies forward for DAML, with far fewer builders watching.