- The Wall Road Journal claimed an Iran-linked community moved $850 million via Binance
- Binance CEO Richard Teng says the reporting is essentially inaccurate
- The dispute lands whereas Binance stays underneath DOJ scrutiny and compliance monitoring
Binance and The Wall Road Journal are preventing once more, however this time the stakes prolong far past popularity harm. A Might 22 WSJ report alleged that an Iran-linked funds community tied to businessman Babak Zanjani processed roughly $850 million via Binance over a two-year interval, allegedly serving to preserve monetary flows linked to Iranian army organizations.
Binance CEO Richard Teng instantly pushed again, calling the reporting inaccurate and defending the change’s sanctions compliance practices publicly on X. The corporate’s core argument facilities round timing, and legally, that distinction issues much more than most headlines counsel.
Binance Says The Transactions Occurred Earlier than Sanctions
In keeping with Teng, the people referenced within the report weren’t formally sanctioned on the time the transactions occurred. Binance insists it didn’t knowingly enable sanctioned entities to function on the platform after designation lists had been up to date.
That’s a vital level as a result of sanctions compliance is mostly judged based mostly on official designation standing on the time of the transaction, not retroactively after sanctions are imposed later. In different phrases, the authorized publicity adjustments considerably relying on when the exercise really came about.
Binance additionally pointed towards inside compliance knowledge displaying sanctions-related publicity falling sharply over time. The change claims sanctions-linked transaction quantity dropped from roughly 0.284% of whole change exercise in early 2024 to only 0.009% by mid-2025.
The Larger Difficulty Is Binance’s Present DOJ Strain
The issue for Binance is that these allegations land whereas the corporate is already working underneath a U.S.-appointed compliance monitor following its large 2023 settlement involving sanctions and anti-money-laundering violations. That settlement price Binance roughly $4.3 billion in penalties and positioned the change underneath intense ongoing regulatory supervision.
Due to that historical past, even disputed allegations tied to sanctions violations now carry way more weight politically and legally than they in any other case may. The DOJ is reportedly nonetheless investigating points of Binance’s operations individually as nicely, that means this combat nearly actually extends past media narratives alone.
And actually, that’s why the state of affairs issues a lot.
Binance and WSJ Are Already Locked in a Bigger Battle
This isn’t the primary main conflict between Binance and The Wall Road Journal both. Earlier this yr, Binance sued Dow Jones, the Journal’s writer, for defamation following earlier reporting tied to sanctions compliance and inside investigations.
The newest report additionally revisited claims that Binance beforehand dismissed inside investigators who flagged greater than 1,500 Iran-linked accounts allegedly working via intermediaries. Binance has strongly disputed these portrayals.
At this stage, the connection between the change and the newspaper more and more resembles an ongoing authorized and reputational battle reasonably than remoted reporting disputes.
Compliance Is Turning into Binance’s Whole Enterprise Story
Binance says greater than 1,500 workers now work in compliance and threat administration roles, representing roughly 1 / 4 of its world workforce. The corporate clearly needs regulators and establishments to view it as a much more mature and compliant operation than the change that existed a number of years in the past.
Whether or not that transformation is totally convincing stays the bigger query hanging over the corporate. Binance’s authorized protection surrounding sanctions timing just isn’t weak, however ongoing investigations imply the ultimate final result probably relies upon way more on regulators and courts than public statements on social media.
For now, the Binance-WSJ battle is changing into one in all crypto’s most essential battles between media scrutiny, regulatory enforcement, and the long run credibility of the business’s largest change.
Disclaimer: BlockNews gives impartial reporting on crypto, blockchain, and digital finance. All content material is for informational functions solely and doesn’t represent monetary recommendation. Readers ought to do their very own analysis earlier than making funding selections. Some articles might use AI instruments to help in drafting, however each piece is reviewed and edited by our editorial crew of skilled crypto writers and analysts earlier than publication.