Technique government chairman Michael Saylor and Blockstream CEO Adam Again have doubled down on their opposition to BIP-110, a proposed momentary fork to restrict non-monetary transactions on the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal-110 was launched in December 2025 to cease nonfungible token-like Ordinals inscriptions and different arbitrary knowledge from “spamming” the community and to protect Bitcoin’s foremost use as a peer-to-peer money system.
Whereas vital of Ordinals exercise, Saylor and Again worry a fork might do extra hurt than good to the community’s credibility. “There are 110 issues extra harmful to Bitcoin than spam,” Saylor mentioned in a put up to X on Saturday, including that BIP-110 might invalidate atypical transactions on the community.
Supply: Michael Saylor
BIP-110 is among the extra notable protocol-level disputes within the Bitcoin improvement neighborhood for the reason that Blocksize Wars between 2015 and 2017, when ecosystem members debated whether or not it was value risking a sequence break up to boost the block measurement restrict for scalability.
BIP-110 was launched by pseudonymous Bitcoin developer “Dathon Ohm” with the assist of Ocean protocol founder Luke Dashjr.
BIP-110 is a protracted shot from activating
BIP-110 will not be activated except 55% of Bitcoin nodes validating blocks are in assist of the proposal throughout a Bitcoin block “interval.”
Within the final interval, interval quantity 475 between block 955,584 and 957,599, only one% of blocks had been BIP-110-supportive.
The dispute comes at a time when Ordinals exercise is at close to all-time lows, with fewer than 10,000 Ordinals inscribed into the Bitcoin blockchain each day during the last month, down massively from the greater than 400,000 seen throughout its peak in August 2023.
Change in day by day Ordinals inscriptions since December 2022. Supply: Dune Analytics
In the meantime, Again provided a deeper critique of BIP-110, describing it as a “quest to police different individuals.”
Associated: Bitcoin would not want Ethereum-style yield, says Technique’s Michael Saylor
He mentioned Bitcoin’s decentralization ought to imply “you’ll be able to’t impose your views on others,” calling it incompatible with Bitcoin’s cypherpunk ethos of permissionless, censorship-resistant cash.
Dashjr and different BIP-110 proponents have known as Ordinals-driven bloat a “severe risk” to the community, prompting the necessity for an imminent repair.
They’ve additionally argued BIP-110 would not trigger a sequence break up, as many worry, whereas including that the BIP-110 fork imposes a brief one-year restrict and thus wouldn’t invalidate fee-paying transactions over the long run.
Options: From Bitcoin critics to blockchain believers: The 5 largest crypto backflips