Adam Again, Blockstream’s CEO, dismissed claims that Satoshi Nakamoto backed BIP-110, a contested Bitcoin (BTC) delicate fork proposal. He mocked its backers on X for failing to fund what he referred to as a cypherpunk summer season celebration.
The alternate unfolded on July 18, 2026, as the talk over BIP-110 proposal approaches a essential signaling deadline. Again predicted the fork try would collapse inside weeks of that deadline.
Adam Again Questions the Satoshi Assumption
A person on X argued Nakamoto would nonetheless again BIP-110 if he have been alive at this time. Again rejected the premise outright. He then questioned whether or not Nakamoto is even useless, calling it pure hypothesis both approach.
Again additionally denied being Nakamoto himself. The comment reopened a long-running debate over Bitcoin governance and who speaks for its founding imaginative and prescient. Again has weighed in on this dispute earlier than, in his earlier fork danger warning.
Bitcoin, in the meantime, traded close to $63,944 on the Bitcoin worth chart, up 1.43% in 24 hours.
BIP-110 Struggles to Acquire Miner Help
BIP-110 would quickly cap the scale of arbitrary knowledge miners can embed in Bitcoin transactions, concentrating on Ordinals-style inscriptions. Nevertheless, miner backing has stayed minimal up to now. Signaling knowledge present simply 0.86% of blocks within the present problem interval help the proposal. That’s far wanting the 55% threshold wanted for lock-in.
Again mocked the proposal’s backers instantly, pointing to their failure to monetize the marketing campaign.
unhappy half is we didnt handle to get the 110 fork to pay for the cypherpunk summer season afterparty. no airdrop, no liquidity, no fork futures. no cash the place their mouth is. ofc as they too realize it’s failed.
Again
The remark, in the meantime, echoes the long-running BIP-110 dispute that has break up builders for months.
What Occurs When Signaling Turns Obligatory
Obligatory signaling begins round block 961,632, roughly three weeks from Friday’s chain tip close to block 958,529. Again predicted the fork would stall nearly instantly afterward.
He stated the primary obligatory signaling block would set off an automated break up. Bitcoin nodes at all times comply with the chain with essentially the most cumulative work.
Miners would have little motive to maintain mining as soon as their chain fell behind, Again stated. He in contrast the deserted fork to a “Pompeii chain,” frozen as a monument to the try’s failure.
The prediction follows Again’s earlier pushback towards separate claims that Bitcoin would successfully hearth noncompliant miners in August.
It additionally lands alongside renewed chatter about Satoshi’s dormant cash, one other flashpoint within the identification debate.
Whether or not BIP-110 prompts or fades away might hinge on what number of miners flip the change as soon as signaling turns obligatory.
The publish Adam Again Talks About Bitcoin BIP-110 Controversy. “Satoshi Was Not Retarded” appeared first on BeInCrypto.