The value of “pace and comfort” within the cryptocurrency house might be as excessive as $12.4 million. An Ethereum (ETH) holder and common crypto person simply discovered that out as he misplaced 4,556 ETH valued at over $12.4 million after he by chance transferred the asset to an attacker’s poison tackle.
How copy-paste error enabled $12.4 million assault
Lookonchain replace defined that the attacker generated a faux tackle containing the primary and final 4 characters of the Galaxy Digital’s actual deposit recipient. The attacker proceeded to ship tiny “mud” transactions to the sufferer’s pockets.
The aim was to simulate a faux or poison tackle within the sufferer’s transaction historical past. The aim of the malicious actor was to make the tackle look legit and acquainted to the sufferer. The attacker was counting on the sufferer not paying shut consideration to particulars, given the similarity within the tackle.
The person, seemingly out of comfort and the necessity to rapidly execute the transaction, opened his transaction historical past and copied what he thought was Galaxy Digital’s tackle. On condition that it’s a transaction he performs frequently, he thought nothing of it and didn’t double-check your entire tackle.
This “copy and paste error” has value the person $12.4 million as he despatched your entire 4,556 ETH to the hacker’s tackle.
The poison tackle type of rip-off assaults is gaining traction within the crypto house as hackers depend on customers not painstakingly checking addresses. In December 2025, one other person misplaced $50 million after they copied a spoofed tackle attributable to visible similarity.
Curiously, with this person, he had executed a check run with $50 to his tackle, and it was this trial that the malicious hacker used to spoof the pockets as a lure. Sadly, the person fell sufferer to transferring the remaining $49,999,950 to the hacker.
Customers warned to be careful for tackle poisoning scams
The frequency of those assaults requires extra vigilance within the crypto house. Customers have to cease copying addresses from transaction historical past. Additionally they should confirm your entire tackle, not simply the primary and final 4 characters, which might be a poisoned tackle.
One person, Mark Huber, whereas reacting to the loss, said that he at all times prioritizes security over comfort when making transactions. Huber claimed that if he had been to ship $12 million, he would most likely ship it in batches of $100,000 at a time.
The concept is to keep away from dropping your entire funds in a single transaction. Others have suggested using the ENS area or tackle e book to keep away from such losses.

