A Financial institution of Canada employees paper discovered that Aave V3 reported zero non-performing loans in 2024, with overcollateralization and automatic liquidations serving to forestall lender losses in its Ethereum lending market.
Utilizing transaction-level information from Jan. 27, 2023, to Could 6, 2025, the research discovered that positions had been sometimes liquidated earlier than collateral values fell under excellent debt, serving to include lender losses throughout the pattern.
However the mannequin got here with a tradeoff, the paper stated. Whereas it protected lenders from unrecovered losses, it additionally shifted danger onto debtors and constrained capital effectivity in contrast with conventional lending programs.
In response to the paper, Aave V3’s design depends on automated danger controls quite than conventional underwriting, requiring debtors to put up extra collateral than they borrow and liquidating positions once they breach danger thresholds.
Recursive leverage fueled borrowing demand
In response to the paper, Aave V3’s lending exercise was not pushed solely by customers in search of liquidity. It discovered that recursive leverage accounted for over 20% of complete borrowed quantity and eight.2% of borrowing transactions throughout the pattern interval.
Recursive leverage includes repeatedly borrowing in opposition to collateral, redeploying the borrowed property as new collateral and borrowing once more to amplify publicity.
Associated: Aave V4 goes dwell on Ethereum after governance vote clears rollout
The research stated the dynamic made debtors extra uncovered when markets turned. In response to the paper, liquidations on Aave V3 tended to happen in concentrated waves, with 4 property accounting for 90% of complete liquidated worth.
This consists of Wrapped Ether (WETH), Wrapped Staked Ether (wstETH), Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) and Wrapped eETH (weETH).
The paper estimated that borrower losses throughout main liquidation occasions could possibly be vital. It stated liquidation charges sometimes ranged from 5% to 10% of liquidated worth, whereas missed good points from subsequent worth recoveries pushed mixed losses to about 10% to 30% in some circumstances.
The employees paper advised that whereas the design for Aave V3 helped forestall unrecovered dangerous debt within the pattern, it did so by exposing debtors to abrupt losses when collateral costs fell sharply.
Cointelegraph reached out to Aave for remark however didn’t obtain a response earlier than publication.
Journal: Are DeFi devs responsible for the criminality of others on their platforms?