David Hoffman, an Ethereum commentator and co-founder of Bankless, has defined why he bought his ETH holdings, claiming that the long-running ‘ETH is Cash’ thesis has basically come to an finish reasonably than fully failed.
ETH falling behind Ethereum
Hoffman’s central declare is surprisingly complicated. He has turn out to be structurally impartial relating to ETH as an asset, however he’s nonetheless optimistic about Ethereum as a community. He believes that whereas Ethereum was profitable as open infrastructure, the ETH token itself didn’t instantly seize sufficient worth.

Hoffman claims that by placing utility, decentralization, and ecosystem enlargement forward of aggressively maximizing ETH’s financial premium, Ethereum took the onerous path. Ethereum is optimized for purposes, rollups, stablecoins, and wider community adoption, in distinction to Bitcoin, which is nearly solely targeted on bolstering BTC as the first product. Though the ecosystem grew considerably on account of that technique, worth seize was additionally dispersed.
XRP Hits $1.4B in ETF Money
Shiba Inu (SHIB) Sellers Exhausted, Dogecoin (DOGE) Zero Addition Query of Time, XRP Restoration Begins: Crypto Market Evaluation
The dynamics of Layer-1 income are amongst Hoffman’s strongest factors. He contends that charges, community exercise, and burn mechanics have gotten more and more vital components in sensible contract chains. He cites situations the place sturdy income progress instantly correlated with improved token efficiency, comparable to Solana, BNB, TRX, and NEAR.
In the meantime, Ethereum moved towards a rollup-centric mannequin, wherein the vast majority of the financial upside is retained by Layer-2 networks. This criticism has goal benefit. Ethereum purposefully pushed exercise towards L2 ecosystems and lowered transaction prices. In distinction to earlier bull market durations, when ETH burn accelerated quickly, this enhanced scalability but in addition decreased charge strain on the bottom layer.
Stablecoins pushed ETH away
Moreover, Hoffman contends that ETH’s place as native web cash was undermined by stablecoins. Greater than $160 billion in stablecoins are at the moment secured by Ethereum, however the majority of this exercise strengthens greenback dominance reasonably than instantly growing demand for ETH. Virtually talking, Ethereum didn’t turn out to be the dominant financial asset itself; reasonably, it turned the infrastructure for different monetary belongings.
A few of his conclusions, nevertheless, are nonetheless up for debate. ETH remains to be used all through the ecosystem as collateral, staking capital, gasoline, and settlement infrastructure. Hoffman’s thesis’s detractors contend that reasonably than being speculative and explosive like in 2021, Ethereum’s worth seize merely turned slower, extra widespread, and extra infrastructure-driven.
Hoffman’s broader level, nevertheless, is difficult to miss: Ethereum prioritized ecosystem success whereas anticipating that ETH’s monetary standing would observe organically. To date, the community has been extra profitable than the asset.

