In short
- A Flock presentation obtained by way of public data exhibits a deliberate Nexar partnership utilizing ~350,000 Uber, Lyft, and supply dashcams to scan plates on the transfer.
- Flock says the take care of Nexar was by no means executed; it is unclear drivers or the apps knew concerning the plan.
- The push comes as Flock faces a LAPD contract exit, roughly two dozen officer-abuse circumstances, and a widening legislative crackdown.
The controversial regulation enforcement vendor Flock Security wished to make each Uber, Lyft, and supply automobile a shifting license-plate reader.
A presentation the corporate wrote for the Georgia Lawyer Basic’s workplace, and later shared with 404 Media, lays out a plan to make use of dashcams from Nexar—an organization whose cameras already sit in a whole lot of hundreds of automobiles—to scan the plates of automobiles these drivers handed.
Flock stated it by no means truly launched the Nexar deal. The doc nonetheless exhibits how far the corporate wished to stretch its attain.
Flock’s regular product is a set digital camera on a pole that logs the plate, shade, make, and mannequin of each automobile that drives previous, constructing a searchable map of the place automobiles go. They’ve turn into extremely divisive in communities the place they’ve gone up, with individuals taking to knocking them down or overlaying them up in protest.
The Nexar concept would have untethered these cameras from the pole. As an alternative of 1 digital camera watching one intersection, 350,000 automobiles would have carried the digital camera with them, filling gaps between mounted websites and monitoring plates throughout complete areas in actual time.
Axon sells the same roaming model for police cruisers; Motorola’s DRN and Vigilant do it by means of repossession brokers’ automobiles. Flock’s pitch was to do it at civilian scale.
Flock hit an $8.4 billion valuation in April and its stationary cameras now cowl greater than 5,000 U.S. communities. But the bottom is shifting underneath that community. In July, the LAPD let its Flock contract expire, citing “critical issues” over civil liberties and privateness.
CNN documented at the least two dozen circumstances by which officers resigned or have been arrested for allegedly abusing Flock’s license-plate system. A presentation pitching a 350,000-car growth landed proper as the corporate’s current footprint drew hearth.
The backlash is not simply native. The non-profit advocacy group EPIC urged Congress in Could to ban computerized license-plate readers outright, and states are shifting on their very own: Washington handed SB 6002 proscribing ALPR (Automated License Plate Recognition) use, and California is weighing a invoice to restrict how the info is shared. Decrypt additionally beforehand reported on a proposed Home invoice that might require warrants for presidency AI surveillance.
Additionally, the implementation of Flock’s cameras on Federal buildings drew a heavy opposition arguing it might violate civil rights.
I’ll quickly be sponsoring a invoice to withhold federal cash from municipalities and police departments that deploy Flock (and different model) cameras to surveil regulation abiding residents. pic.twitter.com/FGzE69psxS
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) July 25, 2026
The authorized entrance is lively too: A federal decide let a Norfolk go well with alleging Flock cameras violate the Fourth Modification proceed, citing the Supreme Courtroom’s Carpenter v. United States ruling on warrantless monitoring.
Each day Debrief E-newsletter
Begin each day with the highest information tales proper now, plus authentic options, a podcast, movies and extra.

