BTC $74,306.00 ▼ 0.22% ETH $2,091.35 ▼ 1.24% BNB $687.10 ▲ 0.40% XRP $1.08 ▼ 0.75% SOL $84.73 ▼ 1.94% TRX $0.3186 ▲ 0.37% FIGR_HELOC $1.04 ZEC $1,150.20 ▼ 5.14% HYPE $73.61 ▲ 0.40% DOGE $0.0694 ▲ 0.36% XMR $553.13 ▼ 7.37% LEO $9.27 ▼ 0.14% WBT $71.51 ▼ 0.49% LINK $10.46 ▼ 1.09%
32 Fear

XRP Ledger proposes quantum‑resistant account upgrade to protect users

XRP Ledger proposes quantum‑resistant account upgrade to protect users Image: CoinGape
Image via CoinGape.

The XRP Ledger Foundation has proposed a quantum‑resistant account upgrade. The design lets users add a NIST‑approved ML‑DSA‑44 signing key and disable existing keys without extra transaction fees. A migration study is scheduled for the first half of 2027. Ripple aims to achieve full quantum protection for the ledger by 2028.

Key points

  1. XRP Ledger has proposed a quantum‑resistant account upgrade.
  2. The upgrade allows users to add a NIST‑approved ML‑DSA‑44 signing key and disable existing keys.
  3. Users will not incur higher transaction fees for the added security.
  4. A migration study is planned for the first half of 2027.
  5. Ripple targets full quantum protection for the ledger by 2028.

Why it matters

The upgrade would enhance wallet security against future quantum attacks without increasing costs, helping maintain confidence in XRP transactions.

What's unclear

Performance test results for the quantum‑resistant signatures have not been published.
The exact activation date of the upgrade after the migration study is not disclosed.

Price context · XRP

At publication
$1.08
Now
$1.08
Change since
+0.19%
7 days · dashed line = publication

Sources · 2 publishers

CoinGape Tier 2 First report
XRP Ledger Unveils Quantum-Resistant Account Upgrade as Ripple Targets Full Protection by 2028
U.Today Tier 2
XRP Ledger Introduces Quantum-Proof Security Upgrade to Users

Coverage timeline

  1. First reported by CoinGape
  2. Also reported by U.Today
  3. CryptoVideos brief published
How this page is checked. AI drafted this brief from selected independent reports. Automated checks compare numbers, source coverage and topic terms, but may miss errors. Publication and evidence refreshes run automatically. Read the linked reports for context. Report an error

Related briefs