BTC $85,011.00 ▲ 0.52% ETH $2,693.28 ▲ 0.47% BNB $788.52 ▲ 2.94% XRP $1.50 ▲ 0.61% SOL $120.96 ▲ 1.17% TRX $0.3353 ▲ 0.07% FIGR_HELOC $1.07 ▲ 2.30% ZEC $1,334.28 ▲ 1.42% HYPE $89.85 ▲ 1.83% DOGE $0.0930 ▲ 0.02% LINK $14.02 ▼ 0.58% XMR $551.11 ▲ 0.58% WBT $84.54 ▲ 0.40% RAIN $0.0131 ▲ 30.00%
65 Greed

Consensys confirms MetaMask wallets unaffected by security incident

Consensys confirms MetaMask wallets unaffected by security incident Image: AMBCrypto
Image via AMBCrypto.

Joseph Lubin, Ethereum co-founder and Consensys founder, confirmed a security incident impacted part of the company's infrastructure in early October 2026. He stated MetaMask wallets, customer funds, user recovery phrases and private keys were not affected by the incident. Consensys rotated validator keys as a precaution, and separate validator and withdrawal keys prevent unauthorized staked ETH transfers. Multiple MetaMask staking validators were exited as a precautionary measure.

Key points

  1. MetaMask wallets, customer funds, user recovery phrases and private keys were not affected by the incident
  2. Consensys rotated validator keys and exited MetaMask staking validators as a precaution
  3. Separate validator and withdrawal keys prevent unauthorized transfers of staked ETH from the incident

Why it matters

The incident highlights that self-custody wallet assets and staking key separation reduce user risk during infrastructure security events. Precautionary validator exits by Consensys partners show coordinated risk mitigation across the Ethereum staking ecosystem.

What's unclear

The specific root cause of the Consensys infrastructure security incident is not publicly disclosed
The exact share of total exited ETH tied directly to the MetaMask incident is unconfirmed

Price context · ETH

At publication
$2,694.41
Now
$2,693.28
Change since
−0.04%
7 days · dashed line = publication

Sources · 2 publishers

Blockonomi Tier 3 First report
Joseph Lubin: No MetaMask Wallets or Customer Funds Affected by Security Incident
AMBCrypto Tier 2
‘No indication that MetaMask wallets were affected’ – Joseph Lubin reassures users

Coverage timeline

  1. First reported by Blockonomi
  2. Confirmed by AMBCrypto
  3. CryptoVideos brief published
How this brief was made. Our system found this event in 2 independent publications, summarised two complete reports with AI and checked every number above against the source text. Sources are linked in full. Not financial advice. Report an error

Related videos

Related briefs